“GLASNOST” AND “PERESTROIKA”
By Van Nguyen
Destabilization was in full
swing with the ascension to power of Mikhail Gorbachev in the Union of
Socialist Soviet Republic (1981-1991). He was a member of the Politburo from
1980. He was chairman of the Foreign
Affairs Commission during the Chernenko administration from 1981 to 1985). He
became secretary- general of the Communist Party from 1985 and president of the
Supreme Soviet from 1988. An advocate for renovation, he introduced liberal political
and economic reforms “glasnost” and “perestroika” inside the union and attempted
to halt the arms race abroad. He became head of State in 1989. In March 1990, he was formally elected to a
five-year term as executive president with greater powers. At home, his executed
plans for economic and political reforms as conceived.
Glasnost (openness) defines Mikhail
Gorbachev’s policy of liberating various political aspects of Soviet life such
areas as introducing greater freedom of expression and information and opening
up relations with Western countries. Glasnost involved the lifting of bans on
books, plays, and films, the release of political dissidents, the tolerance of
religious worship, a reappraisal of Soviet history, the encouragement of
investigative journalism ton, the uncovering of corruption, and the sanctioning
of greater candor in the reporting of social problems and disasters. Journalists‘s
rights to access are guaranteed. There is a right to reply. Citizens have the
rights to receive information from abroad
Under legislation adopted in 1990, censorship
of mass media is abolished; however, publication of State secrets, calls for
the overthrow of the State by force, incitement of national and religious hatred
and State interference in people’s private lives are prohibited. In the
economic sphere, Mikhail Gorbachev failed to avert a food crisis in the winter
of 1990-91 and his desire to preserve a single, centrally-controlled USSR. He
restructured the Party and State bureaucracies
He met with resistance from
Soviet Baltic republics Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania seeking more independent
government systems. In the foreign affairs domain, his achievements gained him
reputation. He was also faced with calls
for cession from the Soviet Union and was forced to reconsider his earlier
opposition to a multiparty system.
Gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990. However, his
reputation suffered as a result of harsh repression of nationalist demonstrations
in the Baltic States in early1991. His peace initiative during the Gulf War
during February 1991 gained him a positive stance among Arab leaders.
In the economic sphere, from
1987, Gorbachev pressed for his wide-ranging domestic economic and political
programs of restructuring, “Perestroika.” The term was first proposed at the 26th
Party Congress in 1979 and actively promoted by Gorbachev himself from 1985. In
the economic sphere, perestroika was conceived as involving “the switching on
to track of intensive development “by automation and improved labor efficiency.” It specifically evolved to attend
increasingly to market indicators and incentives 0f a gradual dismantlement of the
Stalinist central-planning system. Decision-making authority was devolved to
self-financing enterprises. A form of “market socialism” came into being.
As the Soviet economy
disintegrated during 1991, his political strength declined. Gorbachev was able
to counter a short-lived coup in the winter of that year and regained some
stature by helping to coven the Middle East peace conference in Spain in
November 1991. Soviet might nevertheless gradually deteriorated following
successive violent political developments leading to the collapse of the
Eastern Europe Bloc in the later years of the 1980’s.
A New Vision
“Glasnost,” Kien Van noted, “is the catchword for the
new openness about problems in the Soviet Union and the greater tolerance of
dissent. Gorbachev has allowed the Soviet press to publish exposes about the
failures of and corruption in the Soviet system. He has brought Andrei Sakharov
back from internal exile and has released a few other prominent dissidents. He
has increased the number of Jews allowed to emigrate and has given exit visas
to Soviet citizens divided from their spouses in the West. All these steps have
been widely hailed in the West. These developments are significant and
represent a welcome change from the past. But we should always remember that the
literal translation of the “glasnost” is "transparence."
Repression remains the keystone of the Soviet system. While fewer than 100
political dissidents have been released, another 40,000 still languish in
prison camps. While more criticism of the system is permitted, it is all
officially sanctioned criticism. It is no accident that those who are criticized
under Glasnost never argue back.” (Kien Van. Doan Ket, February 1988,
No.38pp.44-49).
In the views of Richard Nixon, “Gorbachev's purpose is
three-fold. He wants to create a more favorable attitude toward the Soviet
Union in the West in order to facilitate his pursuit of more important goals,
agreements on trade and arms control. He wants to use Glasnost to weed out his political opponents. He wants to create
a new spirit among intellectuals and particularly young people in the Soviet
Union. Glanost is a small price to pay.
Gorbachev's speeches overflow with praise to
democracy. But what he means by democracy is different from what we mean by it.
He wants to open up the system; he wants to encourage people to step forth with
new ideas; but his has no intention of relinquishing any of the power and
prerogatives of the Communist Party. There is no real democratization outside
the party. He wants to shake up the system to get it moving again. But it will
not lead to anything remotely resembling a Western democracy.
This slogan for economic reform literally means
restructuring. Gorbachev has spoken in sweeping terms about this program. He
has called for the dismantling of much of the central planning apparatus. He
has endorsed the idea of joint ventures with private Western firms. He has
proposed giving greater decision-making power to factory managers. He has
pushed for allowing some opportunities for very small enterprises to make
private profit. But he has so far achieved little. The day-to-day workings in
the Soviet Union still run by the dictates of the old regime. That Gorbachev
seeks to take a new approach to Soviet problems does not mean that he rejects
the basic premises of his system. He believes that the system is fundamentally
sound but needs to be made more effective. We must remind ourselves that the
reforms themselves tell us nothing about Gorbachev's intentions. Their purpose
is not to move the Soviet Union toward more freedom at home or a less aggressive
abroad, but rather to make the Communist system work better. He wants the
system to be more efficient, not less Communist (Richard Nixon, 1989: 39-40).
No comments:
Post a Comment