Wednesday, May 20, 2015

Evangelical Christianity


 

 Overview

 

In the later year of the 1980's, the political line of "doi moi," the Vietnamese version  of  glanost,”  fanned a hope for change throughout the country. The expectations were high. More representatives of the Christian missions that had operated in Vietnam would have opportunity to enter the swing. Their participation would contribute to the growth of the domestic Churches. There existed at the time in Vietnam some 40 congregations, both official and non-official domestic Churches. Three congregations often assembled in private homes. The increase in number was significant.  Their religious services were still under restriction. Before the Communist takeover of South Vietnam. In 1975, Christian congregations  assembled  in  some 300 church houses. By the end of the 1990’s, the conversions to Evangelical Christianity were on the increase, estimated at 800,000, four times bigger than the number of adepts 25 years previously.  The Church’ .s religious services were nevertheless performed “in hiding.”

 

     Evangelical Christianity in the Northwestern Provinces

 

     Lai Chau

 

Evangelical Christianity was introduced in the mountainous region of the North many years after the reunification of the country.  Tribal groups in the remote northwestern  provinces of Lai Chau, Ha Tuyen, and Son La were the special targets of surveillance of the government.  A large number of H'mong tribesmen were the first converts to Evangelical Christianity. The movement  began in 1989 and developed tremendously in a short period of time. Estimates showed that H'mong Christianss numbered more than 50,000 in a population of approximately a half million. In many areas, H’mong rapid conversion to Christianity was largely due to the  propagation of Gospel through programs in the native language of the Far East Broadcasting Co., an American-based radio network with offices in Hong Kong.

 

 “Security police agents of the Huoi Chan Hamlet, Ang Tu Commune, Tuan Giao District, arrested, incarcerated, imposed fines on, and beat up a number of people because of religious practices   

    

1. On April 19, 1990, Hou A Tong was arrested and beaten up. He is currently detained at No. 10 penitentiary, Dien Bien District.         

2. Hou A Sua had been put in fetters three times, twenty-four hours each time; three times, he had to pay a fine for amends of 40,000 dong. In addition, he was called four times to the commune office and was detained for a period of seven days each time. He was also summoned three times to report to the district authorities of Tuan Giao. Each time, he was imprisoned for one month and imposed a fine for amends of 50,000 dong.3. Seven others were Ly A Sua, Hou A Lenh, Vang A Gio, Vang A Sinh, Vang A Di, Vang A Khai, and Hou A De. They were imprisoned for 7 days and ordered to pay a fine of 50,000 dong. Barbaric treatment was inflicted on all eight of them. They were ordered to pay in kind. Each of them had to supply the authority with 30 kgs of pork, 50 kgs of rice, and 2kgs of chicken.  They were then compelled to stay kneeling on the ground for 60 minutes. The police raised an imitation altar on which they put the pictures of the Lord, which they had confiscated and forced the followers to prepare a meal. They called that a celebration of crimes of the Lord. After that, they humiliated them by preaching a sermon of renunciation. On the same day, they confiscated two tape recorders of Hou A Tong and a radio belonging to Vang A Di. They threatened the followers, saying that if they continued to practice these rites, they would be executed. Lo Van On, the assistant to the District Chief of Security Police Bureau, and a number of cadres of this bureau were responsible for all these doings.  

 

The Vietnamese administration showed deep concerns. The Nhan Dan (The People) in April 1991 stressed that the conversion of increasing numbers of H'mong was a widespread movement causing damage to the security of the country. The government tried to disbelieve newly converted H'mong believers systematically, with emphasis on their low cultural standards.

   

Politically, the H’mong were accused of serving a scheme to overthrow the Communist regime and seeking to join a religious movement that the H'mong followers in the South  had initiated. Because of this, H'mong Christians suffered persecution with beatings, forced labor, harassment --State interference in farming and harvesting, imprisonment, threat, forced immigration, and property dispossession. The abuses begun in 1991, continued and multiplied in 1992, and reached a peak in the summer of 1993. H'mong Christians suffered severe physical abuse. Authorities reportedly "played game" with them, forcing them to kneel and worship government officials and their wives. Bibles and radios were regularly confiscated. H'mong women and children were also reportedly abused. These incidents caused some believers to flee to surrounding jungles to hold Bible studies and prayer meetings under constant fear of police persecution.

 

     Instances of Persecution

 

The H’mong believers repeatedly sent petitions  to the  local and provincial officials. After unsuccessful requests for redress at the local level, in February 1993, a H'mong delegation of eleven men, led by the Vietnamese Christian leaders in Hanoi, came to the Ministry for the Interior to request in audience with the authority in charge and to report in detail about the beatings, jailing, and other instances of mistreatment they had suffered. An official at the Ministry certified their claims and issued a record of evidence. The action came to no help. Persecution persisted despite petitions and claims.

   

On January 10, 1994, the police arrested Thao A Tong, a H'mong leader in Hong Thu Commune while he was preaching the Gospel. He was charged with "taking advantage of religion to break the laws and distract people from the productive labor."  They also arrested Giang A Di, a layman. There were no news of a trial, H'mong Christians feared that these leaders suffered the same fate as did their fellow Christians that had been arrested and were interned indefinitely, and without trial.

   

The People's Court of Lai Chau Province sentenced Ho Giong Cua to 18 months in prison on charges of indicting the local authorities for religious repression. Ho had sent two petitions with his and twenty-four other representatives' signatures from three different communes on them to the provincial and central authorities citing evidences of constant repression against Christianity by the communal authorities. The petitions came to no answer, and the petitioner was targeted with suspicion. He was arrested on ungrounded charges, sentenced, and imprisoned. 

 

News of religious repression in Lai Chau and other regions in North Vietnam reached the refugee communities overseas. However, they often failed to reach the mass media.  A mixture of feelings was felt in the officia mass  media and some religious circles. The official magazine Dai Doan Ket (Great Union) of the Fatherland Front of Vietnam, on April 17, 1992, reported incidents of “religious blasphemy” in Lai Chau Province. The Catholic priest-deputy Phan Khac Tu nevertheless testified before the National Assembly of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam that instances of abuses of power in matters of religion occurred and false accusations by local authorities regarding the religious practices of the some ethnic minorities in the northwestern highlands caused disadvantage in religious worship.

 

     Ha Giang

 

     Despite repression Christian membership continued to climb. The small Evangelical Church grew with remarkable speed, notably in Ha TGiang, Tuyen Quang, and Lao Kay. This northwestern mountainous region  shelters as many as 23 ethnic minority groups certain of which live on both sides of the Vietnamese-Chinese borders. According to the Christian Today, an old missionary in Vietnam who wanted to be anonymous reported that the community of Evangelical Christians developed considerably among the H’mong. The faithful was estimated at seven hundred thousand (700,000) in the 1990’s, seven times more numerous than in was in 1975, the date of the change of political regime. The most remarkable progress took place in the bosom of the H’mong ethnic communes. For a decade long (1980-1990), at least one hundred twenty thousand (120,000) H’mong living in Ha (Giang)- Tuyen (Quang) along the Vietnamese-Chinese borders had embraced Christianity.

    

No one knows how Christian members of tribal groups suffered from police harassment, threats, and abuses of violence. One thing is certain, Christian leaders and believers served their faith with fervor regardless of  all hazards. The News Network International reported that the police, on April 23, 1995, arrested the Reverend Pham Quang Vinh, a pastor of Evangelical Christianity of North Vietnam and his companion, a Korean, were arrested when they were traveling in the mountainous province of Lao Kay. The pastor, who belongs to the Evangelical Christian Church officially recognized by the authorities, was detained for eight days during which he was continuously interrogated.

 

Sources said that the first campaign of repression was launched in 1997. The letter of the chairman of the People’s Council of the province Ha Tuyen to many families in the region in October 1997 expressively declare that the conversion to Christianity constituted an act of opposition to the Party and the law of the State on religious freedom. “Our people must not be abused by evil elements that convert us to the other religion.”  In contrast, the letter dated December 30, 1997 written in an approximate Vietnamese and signed by some forty people in the name of a group of three hundred inhabitants of a commune in Ha Giang described the authorities’ accusation as a brutal act of intimidation. Abuses of power with all forms of repression had forced the group of Christians to run away and hide in the forest.    

 

The author of the report recognized that the religious situation of the Christians was improving considerably in comparison with what it had been in the first ten years under the Communist regime since the takeover of South Vietnam. He affirmed, however, that the believers had to brave danger to become a Christian thereafter. Abuses of power of the Communist authorities at the Evangelical Christians were tantamount to repression in Ha Giang. Group leaders were beaten. Others were detained without a trial. Still, others were arrested and detained during variable periods and lived in dismal conditions.

 

Two documents published in the Vietnamese review Tin Nha (News from Home) in January 1999 illustrated instances of repression against the Evangelical Christians in Ha Giang.  Both documents showed the deliberate intention of the  local authorities to inhibit all conversions to Christianity in the ethnic minorities of the northwestern mountainous region. The first document is a circular of the chairman of the People’s Council of the province of  Ha Giang of June 27, 1997 expressing concern about the demand for conversion to Christianity of a number of families of the ethnic minorities. The second document is the  application form to be filled out and signed by the population in which the signatory pledges to adopt a number of attitudes and behaviors as regards religion. 

 

The circular of the highest authority of the province of Ha Giang, which appeared to be the reply to eleven thousand (11,000) H’mong of the commune of Lang Ngoa. It particularly informed the local authorities of the official demand for adherence to Christianity of this tribal ethnic group. The document stresses the respect for religious freedom with emphasis on the right to traditional worship according to which “no one can force a believer who traditionally practices a religion recognized by the State to follow another religion.”  The instruction is rather a warning. Mass conversions to Evangelical Christianity was then on the rise and posed a problem to the State.  “Evildoers,” who, for many years, had used religious freedom as a shield to fan up a movement of conversions to “Ki To” (Catholicism)  and “Tin Lanh” (Evangelical Christianity). The restitution these conversions, as foreseen by the authorities, might cause a rupture of the traditional unity of the family life of the commune. The population was asked to exercize the right given to them by the State, and not to follow either religion.

The second document appears in a form of an application, particularly for the inhabitants of the district of Bac Me. Ha Giang Province. To fill out a number of inscriptions of identity and confirmation, the signatory is made aware of a list of texts and circulars concerning religion prepared by the regional civil authorities. It covers such items as: 1)  The signatory pledges to follow necessary engagements concerning religious activities; 2)  The signatory pledges not to participate in the study of catechism, not to adhere to Christianity; 4) The signatory pledges to intervene in any of such engagements by his/her fellow tribesmen in the commune so that they will not listen to the Christians and proceed illegal religious practices; 5) The signatory pledges to make report to the authorities about those who continue to propagate the religion and denounce the activities of the preacher from the outside; and 6) The signatory pledges that if he/she infringes on these engagements, he or she will bear the consequences before the law.

 

Repression against members of the Evangelical Church in the Northwest continued. In January 1999, the official review Phap Luat  (Legal Gazette), published in Hanoi, recounted the incident of repression against believers of the Evangelical Church in the province of Ha Giang. A special military detachment was put in place to “fix” the problem of illegal religious evangelical propagation.” These “bad elements”  practiced clandestinely a worship called “Vang Chu,” attracting approximately six thousand followers. They destroyed their old sanctuaries. They forsake their traditional ceremony of marriage. Instead of celebrating traditional rituals for funerals, they threw corpses into hollowed gutters.  The allegations were hinted at the new  religious practices during a funeral ceremony of those H’mong who renounced the worship of “ma” (ghosts) and adopted a novel way of honoring the dead in conformity with Christian religious rituals and practices.     

 

To stop the movement of conversions in agreement with the strategy from the central organ,  the local authorities sought to “strike the snake at the head.” About thirty leaders of the Church were arrested and detained in the prisons and concentration camps. H’mong who evaded from Vietnam and sought refuge in Thailand confirmed atrocities inflicted on them by Communist cadres. H’mong Christians were forced to sign a contract of engagement in which they were forced to pledge not to adhere to Christianity. The authorities launched campaigns of repression against Evangelical Christianity, which the Communist authorities consider as instrument of imperialism.

 

    Lao Kay

 

In Lao Kay Province where conversions to Christianity of the H’mong was phenomenal the relations between the authorities and tribal minority groups became increasingly tense. The authorities of the province   had deep concerns about the growth  and activities of  the tribal Christians as did their colleagues in Ha Giang. Top secret documents prepared by the Office of Minority and Religious Affairs reveals the reasons for which preventive measures to stop the movement of conversions to Christianity. The differences in the views of the world  between the Marxists and believers Therefore, the imperialists exploit religion to resist, oppose, and destroy the “revolution.”  One of crucial tasks to prevent the exploitation of religion in the new situation include: All ranks and levels should organize to effectively carry out policies and procedures and make these a part of daily life.

 

In 1999, a forty-page anti-Christian pamphlet by the Vietnamese Communist Party in the province of Ha Giang reveals that repression during the previous years was deplorable. A list of 40 H'mong Christians serving sentences their faith was established. Twenty among them were liberated in 1999. Some were released before the expiration of their penalties; and others still served their terms. In November 1999 by the information Bureau of Lao Kay used a training booklet of 31 pages  to help cadres handle the situation of Evangelical Christianity. Conversions to Christianity nevertheless spiraled with a steady speed. The number of H’mong adherents to Evangelical Christianity was the estimated between one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) to three hundred thousand (300,000). The movement appeared to be a problem to the administration.                                                                                                                                                                             On May 5, 1999, the Steering Committee 184 in Hanoi developed a strategy to handle the situation. The Committee particularly set guidelines for implementation  of religious policies and solutions to solve the problem the religion, particularly in the mountainous provinces of the Northwest. Efforts were made to completely stop all negative manifestations of religion and fight against evil elements that exploit religion and cause unrest. Programs 184 B laid out specific policies towards Evangelical Churches among ethnic  highland minorities Anti-Christian measures against the H’mong followed, forcing an estimated 8,000 to 10,000 fled their ancestral lands mostly to Dak Lak in the Central Highlands, a thousand kilometers away. 

 

Hundreds of copies of complaints, written  with a simple style but well articulated with emphasis on the situation of the H’.mong reached  the responsible of the State organs. The great majority of these petitions, were ignored. The petitioners often received warnings with threat from the local authorities instead of legal redress. A report published in mid-2002 by the International Christian Concern presents the cases of such incidents.  Rarely did the Christians receive answer from the Provincial People's Council of Lao Kay; neither did they receive one from the Office of Cultural and Religious Affairs. On one occasion, the petitioners were accused  of  having violated all kinds of strange administrative procedures that they had not known.

 

These servants of God claimed that they were, in fact, outlawed. They had sought in vain to join the Evangelical Church of North Vietnam. Any effort  to come into contact with this institution was considered illegal by the authorities. They could not reclaim their religious freedom because in Vietnam  the “enemy” always exploits that freedom to oppose the the religious policy of the “Revolution.” The local public officials,” according to the report, “apply correctly the policy of the Party and government in religious matters. They do not interdict religious practices but illegal activities such as the diffusion and the teaching of the Christian religion, the illegal assembly of the Christians, the reception and usage of Bibles and religious literature of every kind, the installation of religious organizations  in the  hamlets and communes, and  the creation of church budget."

 

     Dien Bien

 

Under strict control, other H’mong Christians could not escape persecution. Among the first victims was a H'mong Christian  of 36 years of age, Hua Bua Senh.  During May-July 2002, Senh and his family sent petitions to the central government, complaining about the atrocity of the public officials of Dien Bien Dong. Senh was brutally beaten because he had refused to renounce his faith. The family’s petitions nevertheless came to no answer.  In August 2002, Senh died of the wounds caused by multiple coups felled on him by the authorities.  His family sent a letter, which was also signed by many witnesses, presenting how Sent had been tortured while being forced to renounce his faith. The letter was. sent to the central government, but came to no answer. The local public officials, on their part, evicted Senh’ s family members and three other Christian families from their houses without a notice.

 

In October 2001, the local authorities published a bilingual Vietnamese- H’mong brochure of 60 pages entitled "Don't believe the words that distill the venom of the snake."  Among other things, the official work of propaganda averts on purpose the term God in the H'mong language by disfiguring the meaning of the term Vang Chu --Kingdom of the Lord in Heaven,-- and interpreting it for political motive, the Kingdom of H’mong.  The term suggests, in a sense, the H’mong anticipated  to create H'mong self-administrative territory. On the other hand, the cadres did not hesitate to sketch grossly the Christian faith and religious practices. The Christian pastors were portrayed as  “ lazy; they teach people not to work and fulfill civic duties. They believe and make believe that rocks could be changed into chickens, pigs, or horses and that the earth would explode in the year 2000.” These rumors were repeated with satiety without furnishing any proof.

 

Mass conversions among the H’mong was already on the move. They grew mostly thanks to the alphabetization of the H'mong alphabetical script. The H’mong Christians studied Bible and Christian texts in the Vietnamese and H’mong languages. Due to the contact with the Vietnamese Christians in Hanoi and also with a touch of freedom, certain H'mong began to write petitions for their benefits to the local or central governmental authorities. They denounced the abuses  they had suffered, cited the names of corrupt public officials, and demanded for religious freedom. They wished  to practice their faith as foreseen by the “public policy,” the freedom that their Vietnamese fellow-countrymen in Hanoi had ever enjoyed.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

The Survival of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam

`

  

The conflict between the State and the Unified Buddhist Church grew increasingly tense. The State-affiliated Buddhist Church entered the fight. The State-instituted Executive Council of Buddhism in a session of work attributed to the activities of the dissident Church as dangerous.  Many monks of the outlawed Church were accused of “having sabotaged the solidarity among the Buddhists as well as national union.” (AFP, Feb. 8, 1995). The remark was reportedly pronounced by the Venerable Kim Cuong Tu, Vice-president of the Council and aimed at the leaders of the Vietnam Unified Buddhist Church as well as the members of the State-created Church who supported the demands for independence from the State. The State, on its part, showed vigilance and determination.


The persecution of the Unified Buddhist Church was in full swing. On November 22, 1996, approximately 200 security police raided the 500-year-old Linh Mu Pagoda and arrested several prominent Buddhist monks, among whom were the Venerable Thich Hai Thinh and the Venerable Thich Hai Chanh who had served terms in jail for taking part in the 1993 event, protesting against the Communist rule's religious repression. The local Communist rule took control of the pagoda under the pretext that it was a center for anti-Communist activities. The police also razed to the ground the Long Tho Pagoda near the resort township of Da Lat, 110 miles north of Saigon.  On October 30, 1996, the Venerable Thich Minh Dao, the senior monk at Long Tho Pagoda, Da Lat Township, was arrested, and 34 other Buddhist monks and nuns were chased out of the pagoda before it was destroyed.


    Repression

   

The Puebla Institute, a human right organization that defends religion worldwide reported that repression against all Vietnam’s religions continued. Vietnam, it noted, demonstrates that the repressive apparatus against all religions remains widespread and resilient despite the market reforms. A number of religious prisoners were among five thousand and two hundred (5,200) prisoners released from prison by the chief of the State on the National Day, September 2, 1998. Until then, 75 Buddhist monks and followers were still detained or placed under house arrest. Three Buddhist monks benefited from this annual amnesty. They were the Venerable  Thich Tri Sieu, who was freed from prison on August 31, 1998 and the Venerable Thich Tue Sy and the Most Venerable Thich Quang Do. who were liberated the next day, September 1, 1998.  The Most Venerable Thich Quang Do, the Secretary-general of the Vietnam Unified Buddhist Church, was freed from the Ba Sao camp, Nam Ha Province, North Vietnam, September 2, 1998. Arrested in 1977 and detained for 20 months, he was apprehended again in 1982 and exiled to the province of Thai Binh, North Vietnam. In 1992, the monk, on his own initiatives, left the place of exile. He came back and lived in Saigon.


He was restricted on January 4, 1995 after having written to the Communist authorities an open letter of three pages entitled “Remarks on the Ill-conceived  Errors Committed by Communism against Buddhism.” On August 15, 1995, the People’s Court imposed on him five years in prison for “having committed acts of sabotage against the politics of union of religions and utilized liberty and democracy to make an attempt of sabotage against the interests of the State.” He refused to make an appeal. He was then transferred from Saigon to North Vietnam and detained in the Ba Sao  camp. Released from prison, he was welcomed at the Tan Son Nhat Airport by five hundred Buddhist followers. The Most Venerable Thich Quang Do has been closely watched over by the State authorities.

       

     The Measures


The common repressive measure applied to returnees from prisons and camps are administrative surveillance and harassment. The decree on administrative detention (1977), on the other hand, allows the Communist administration to lengthen the term of detention to two years without trial. It aims to prevent, threaten, compel, and repress dissidents from advocating democracy and human rights. This form of arrest was executed against the Most Venerable Thich Huyen Quang. 


Requests and demands from the Church nevertheless fell to deaf ears. The authorities mounted repression on it, instead. A string of instances of repression came in succession, aggravating the situation. In addition, the State failed to integrate the Vietnam Unified Church into the State-sponsored Vietnam Buddhist Church. Like a thorn in its side, the Unified Buddhist Church always proved to be a legal and independent Church and not an association.  In this regard, it resolutely refuted the legitimacy of the Buddhist Church of Vietnam as a rightful entity as it is only an instrument of the Vietnamese Communist Party-- a member of the Fatherland Front-  a creation of the Vietnamese Communist Party itself.


Due to the failure to subordinate the Vietnam Unified Buddhist Church under State control, the Vietnamese Communist Party and State isolate it from the people’s life. Cornered to dead end, the Church survives in extreme conditions, although it continuously receives strong support from international public opinion, human rights organizations, world prestigious personalities and politicians, and Vietnamese religious organizations and communities overseas


The Eighth congress of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam Overseas, Office II, in California in May 1999 proceeded with determination to consolidate its body of leadership overseas, to and foster its activities in support for the struggle for religious freedom and Buddhist Faith in the country. Nominations to highest positions in the hierarchy and adjustments in the administration of the Church in the country were then revived (EDA 288). Humanitarian services and activities were organized and performed, although in harsh conditions of severe weather and impediment from the government. The delegations of aids to the regions devastated by flood of the Unified Church nevertheless gathered remarkable success.

    

The Vietnam Unified Buddhist Church has still proven to be worthy of a religious institution that not only dedicates itself to the noble ideals of clemency of the Buddhist Faith but also commits acts of tangible fearlessness when it comes to salvage human beings. In his letter sent to the government, the Patriarch Huyen Quang on the occasion of the commemoration of April 30 --the day when the Communists took over Saigon-- proposed, among other things, to the government  to  clarify that the anniversary of the liberation of Saigon is a day for penitence and mourning (EDA 308). 


The  State Bureau of Religious Affairs nonetheless mounted pressure on the Church, suggesting to the Church  to encourage its monks and adepts to rejoin the ranks of the “official” Church.  However, many religious personalities of Buddhism felt reluctant to the State hypocritical mannerism; others showed indignation over the State persecution of the Church.  Frequent visits of the police who came to interrogate them on diverse hot subjects remained a nightmare. Reports and interviews on these incidents were transmitted to humanitarian agencies in the Occident (communiques of the Bureau of Buddhist International Information from July 18, 2000 and August 10, 2000).