Saturday, November 28, 2015

RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION IN THE MODERN ERA





Overview


During the eleventh session of the National Assembly, April 7, 1997, Deputy Phan Khac Tu, a Catholic priest and State’s “protégé,” came up  with the theme of civil liberties. His speech, which was published in its entirety in the Catholic review Catholicism and the Nation (No. 1104, May 4, 1997), devoted all the last part to the application of the politics of religious freedom. The deputy particularly criticized the gross manner with which certain regional authorities had executed with regard to the policy: “The applications depend on the manner in which the rule is interpreted, mostly on the whims and wishes of diverse services, regional authorities, and the cadres in this specialized domain. Twenty years after reunification of the  country, no uniformity of application of the rules has been applied, as far as religious freedom  is concerned.”     

    

The compilation of a new law as regards religious policy constituted a primary concern of the Eighth congress that took place in June 1996. Special considerations were given to the compilation of a new law for the religion with well-defined provisions. Expert compilers were entrusted with the task. The keynote presenter from the Politburo nevertheless kept a complete silence on a promulgation of the coming law. In his presentation before the congress, the presenter even showed himself  discreet. The religion constitutes a factor and also an impediment to socialist buildup. The presenter seemingly thinned out the issue in certain aspects. To the observer, the term religion, for instance, was used but sparingly in his speech; it was later mentioned without clear-set definition in Chapter VII entitled “Accentuate the Reinforcement of the Unity of the People on the whole.” This caution on the part of the presenter constituted a negative attitude of the State toward the religion; it suggests some significance of an ill omen to a concerned observer  (EDA 226).


The Catholics, in general, expected the government, after years of hard time would eventually relax its control on the religion, Attempts were made to revive activities of religious groups in various parishes rekindled new hope. Within a short time, all initiatives of voluntary will of this kind proved to be futile, however.  For the diocese of Xuan Loc, as a case in point, the local authorities flatly repressed suspected troublemakers, placing them under house arrest. A report in 1997 from  a parish in Dong Nai Province recounted that, while in a meeting, members of the Catholic Mothers received a visit of the police for unspecified reason. The president of the association was then convoked for interrogation at the police headquarters. The authorities of the province of Dong Nai, in another instance, raised question on and probed into the existence of several religious councils of parishes in  the diocese of Xuan Loc,  Dong Nai Province.


Curiously enough, while, in the Dong Xoai Parish, Saigon Diocese, where the State-affiliated member of the Committee of Union of Catholics Phan Khac Tu was the vicar, activities of all forms were performed without approbation from the authorities of the city,  In truth, for many years, the parishes in Xuan Loc suffered suppression. The authorities of Dong Nai Province pronounced the dissolution of all Catholic associations in the Xuan Loc diocese. As a result, beginning in April 1997, conflict between the local authorities and the parishioners ever  intensified. The diocese is a large congregations of Catholics the majority of whom came from North Vietnam after the Geneva Agreements in 1954 and was well-known for anti-Communist action. 


Tension persisted. In August 1997, The State tightened control, fomenting discontent of the local Catholic population. Tension escalated to such an extent that the Politburo had to send to  the diocese of Xuan Loc one of its members, Pham The Duyet, the Head of the Office of People’s Actions. Pham was appointed the politics mediator representing the Politburo to settle the complication between the population and the local administration in the riot in Thai Binh Province previously. Upon his coming to the  diocese of Xuan Loc, he met with Bishop Nguyen Minh Nhat and his coadjutor, Nguyen Van Tran, and some other priests. The meeting between the two parties, according to the local sources, was short and comic. 


At the outset, the friction between the local authorities and the prelacy of Xuan Loc  began with the publication of a brochure entitled “Guidelines for Parochial Activities of the Parish Council” by the diocese of Xuan Loc.  He act was to the t authorities an infringement on the law of the State. The  People’s Council of Dong Nai sent to its subordinate district people’s councils  a circular with remarks and directives on the subject, specifying that the brochure was published without permission and that its contents  were erroneous and were in contradiction with the actual regulations of the State concerning the legal status of the diocese as a social association, in general, and as a religious entity, in particular.  It blamed the bishop of the diocese for reorganizing the diocese in contradiction to the law. The orientations in the brochure were attributed  to as mistakes repeatedly committed, first, by the former bishop of the diocese, Msgr. Lang, who had signed the common letter of 1981, then by personal engagement in the publication of the said 00brochure of Bishop Nguyen Minh Nhat  

    

Substantially, the circular accused the Bishop of Xuan Loc of forming religious organizations which were not qualified for religious ones. These organizations, in reality, are simply religious associations operating in conjunction with and under the supervision of the Church’s clergy in the domain of fraternity such as the Alliance of Sacred Heart, the Legio of Mary, the Association of Heads of Families, the Catholic Mothers, the Eucharist Crusade, and so on. They are simply the religious groups of the Church that operate within the Church and under the supervision of the clergy. The bishop was also blamed for having reshaped the Church's organization, creating milieus of activities for the youth, and placing their supervision of a Church committee chaired by a priest or a lay person. The status of these organizations of new groups had not been prescribed in the organization program for ordinary religious practices. 

      

To adorn what is considered as a serious deviation, the circular of the People’s Council of the province of Dong Nai announced a number of measures. The most important one dictated the dissolution of all movements, organizations, and milieus. The new measures evinced a strong emotion among the Catholic population of the diocese. Discontent was manifest at the meeting between Pham The Duyet and the  Catholics. This member of the Politburo tried to appease the audience’s anger, promising to facilitate a peaceful dialogue between the authorities and the Catholic community. The Catholic side demanded with firmness that the problem in question be solved and the decisions adopted by the local authorities be revoked.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Message from U. S. Catholic Conference of Bishops




Bishop Daniel P. Reilly, Chairman of the U .S. Catholic Conference on Internal Policy, on September 15, 1994, released a statement of the Committee on religious freedom in Vietnam which is as follows:


“On February, third of this year, President Clinton, ended the United States trade embargo against Vietnam, making another milestone in the long and painful journey from the devastation of war  toward greater contact and mutual understanding. As we welcome this change of policy on the part of our government, we wish also to note the areas of our  special concern  with regard to Vietnam, particularly the matter of religious freedom in that country and the still  unsettled fate of thousands of refugees.

         

In our 1989 pastoral statement on relations  between the United States and Vietnam, “A Time for Dialogue and Healing,” we affirmed the solidarity between the Church of Vietnam and that of the U. S., emphasized our concern for  religious liberty, and said “it  is time to move beyond the legacy of war, to begin to respond to the pressing needs of those affected by that war, and to address  better both the problems and possibilities of a new relationship between the American  and Vietnamese peoples”. We renewed the appeal made on December 2, 1975 by the leadership of our Conference and other religious bodies that  the trade embargo be lifted as soon as possible. Now, after nineteen years, a more equitable relationship may be possible, but serious challenges remain.

       

The issues that have governed relations between our two countries over those years have centered largely on the geopolitical role played by Vietnam, chiefly with regard to Cambodia , and the abiding concern of the American people for full accountability of our POWs and MIAs. The Cold War concerns have failed  and most agree that Vietnam has been generally forthcoming on the POW/MIA issue, with prospects for still greater cooperation enhanced now by ending the sanctions.

        

Less attention has been given to the question of the religious rights of the Vietnamese people and specifically to the ability of the Catholic Church to function freely As in several other countries in our time, the Vietnam Communist Party’s control over and hostility to religious belief and practice was exceedingly harsh in the years immediately following the war. By all accounts, the present situation, while less than satisfactory, may represents one improvement over the previous period.

Maryknoll, begun to work in Vietnam and five of the country’s seminaries, with a variety of limitations, were allowed to reopen.

   

"Yet, serious restrictions on religious practices remained intact," a priest who asked anonymity said.."  Our concerns about religious liberty begin with each own family of faith, but they do not end there. Recent crackdowns on religious groups have tended to be directed  most directly at members of the Unified Buddhist Church, and against the evangelical house church movement, and are just as objectionable as the restrictions imposed on the Catholic Church. Government efforts to interfere with the Catholic Church's internal affairs. It is neither the function of the State to approve or withhold approval for candidates to the priesthood, nor to restrict  a bishop’s freedom to name his pastors or transfer priests should clergy be restricted  from traveling freely within his diocese. just to perform his ministry. It is up to the Church to run its own affairs, to nominate bishops, to receive student-priests without government interference. "






The Vatican and Hanoi


At the end of 1990, a Vatican delegation, headed by Cardinal Roger Etchegaray, representing both the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace and “Cor Unum,” paid an official visit to Vietnam. In that same year, some 21 of the Vietnamese bishops (most and not all bishops of the conference) were permitted for the first time to make theirad ilimina” visit to the Holy Father, following   “a dialogue which augurs well for the future has begun,. ,,,” as the Pope said to the bishops in Rome in a meeting.  Talks between the Holy See and the Hanoi continued during the visit to the country of  another Vatican  delegation  led by Msgr. Claudio Celli  of the Holy  Secretariat  of State in early 1992 and again just this year, and a visit by Vietnam officials to the Vatican in 1992. In both instances, the National Conference of Catholic Bishops  of Vietnam presented to the Prime Minister  the restrictions imposed on them  forth and the still-existing problems facing the Church, urging  him to remedy the situation.

   

The Holy See had, just this year, concurrently named  bishop of Hanoi archbishop and appointed several other dignitaries bishops. However, there still remained an unacceptable degree of  government interference in  the  nomination and appointment. The nominee or appointee  must meet certain sine-qua-non requirements established bf the authorities.. As Msgr. Celli said, by reluctantly accepting State decision on the matter, the Church saw  its deprivation of the desire to nominate bishops on its terms" "The international documents on religious liberty affirm that every religion has a right to freely designate its own ministers.” Nevertheless, Hanoi Shows some signs of tolerance. Several of the arrested clergy had been released,, among whom Fr. Dominic Tran Dinh Thu, founder of the Congregation of Mother Co-Redemptrix, and four other priests of the congregation. Some relaxation was felt in humanitarian services. Mother Theresa of the Missionaries of Charity and the Catholic Foreign Mission Society,   


In a two-column article in the magazine “Thirty Days,” published in Rome, in January 1992, Gianni Valette reported news on a visit of a Vatican delegate to Vietnam. It consisted of Mgr. Claudio Celli and Mgr. Nguyen Van Phuong. The two Vatican officials met with Vietnamese high-ranking officials. The meetings were described as "intimate and friendly." However, the Vietnamese Catholic circles were doubtful of such asmile policy” by the State. They were afraid that it was only a tactic in its strategy to "make peace" with the Vatican while seeking opportunities to ingeniously place docile Catholic priests in important positions in the Roman Catholic clerical hierarchy.  Pursuing this purpose, the State nominated Huynh Cong Minh, the pastor of the Saigon Main Cathedral and former leader of the Association of “Patriotic” Catholics, the representative of the Saigon prelacy. Apparently, Huynh Cong Minh was no longer a member of the Executive Board of the Communist-installed Committee for Solidarity of Catholics whose task was to help the Vietnamese Communist Party and State, to campaign, seeking support from the Catholics to carry out the Party's policy. Huynh Cong Minh, in reality, was then the key decision-maker representing the Party beside the Church's clerical hierarchy. Huynh' s pronouncements in many instances were thought to acts covert intrigue benefiting the authorities. To warn against deviations from priestly duties and performances, in 1992, Cardinal Sodano, Minister Plenipotentiary of the Vatican, sent a letter to the Bishops of Vietnam reminding them of a religious law that prohibits Catholic priests to participate in political organizations and asked them to find ways to withdraw from the State-installed Committee for Solidarity of Catholics.


       Religious Intolerance


Religious practices  in Vietnam is riddled with restrictions. This gives rise to many problems simply because of the State religious intolerance, which is pervasive in  all sectors of life. In an interview with the Vietnamese newspaper Ngay Nay (Today), published in Houston, Texas, during his accompaniment with Pope John Paul II at the Eighth Conference of the World Catholic Youth in Denver, Colorado, August 11-15, 1993, Cardinal Angelo Sodano said that the Vietnamese government needed to translate into reality the basic rights to freedoms:. He stressed that  “ to speak of the rights to freedom in Vietnam is to speak of the basic human rights. The Government of Vietnam is a signatory to international treaties and covenants pledges to  abide by the international clauses on human rights. Thus,  it needs to carry them out. When the Holy Father calls for the rights to freedom, he calls for freedom for every human person, and not only for the Catholics. Let's hope and pray for Vietnam. The Vatican would do to help the Roman Catholic Church of Vietnam to claim back its establishments, cathedrals, schools, and so on, which have come into possession of the Communist administration.  The Vietnamese government already gave signs of greater understanding of the demand for the freedom of the Church. We only demand for freedom of religion. We do not demand these rights for the Catholics but for believers of all religions, for the people of Vietnam. I believe that every community has the rights to religious freedom and religious practices.  The Catholic Church of Vietnam needs to have freedom in organizing seminaries, receiving and forming its priests according to its standards. Sooner or later, these rights should be recognized by the Vietnamese government."


Uneasiness


Uneasiness marked the preparations for the visit to Vietnam by Mugs. Alberto Ablondi during August 11-17, 1994. The prelate was then the Bishop of Livourne, Italy, and President of the Catholic Biblical Federation. It was with these two titles that enabled the bishop to make the visit. The biblical association of which he was the president had  contributed to the publication of the most recent Vietnamese translation of the New Testament. He had been invited to a reception organized for public presentation of the biblical work in Saigon.  On this occasion, he wished to personally meet the seminarians from North Vietnam of the diocese, particularly the two recipients of the scholarship accorded by the faithful of Livourne. At first,, the Embassy of Vietnam in Italy refused to give the prelate an entry visa to Vietnam under the pretext that he was a devotee of "religious propaganda." However, after many negotiations , he was accoded authorization to enter Vietnam. The Vietnamese authorities nevertheless complicated the matter when he arrived in Vietnam. (EDA. November 1, 1994)

      .

     In an interview with the Vatican Radio on his return from Vietnam, the prelate gave his impressions on his visit when replying to a question on the religious situation in Vietnam as follows:


"The religious situation in Vietnam may well be summarized in terms of the celebration in which we participated --a great ceremony that was organized by the archdiocese at the living room in the residence of the archbishop,  with the participation of many personalities, common people, and, especially that "before his arrival, Bible specialists and people who are interested in  Bible . This ceremony of presentation of the new biblical translation had minutes of difficulties: two people could not obtain authorization for participation from the police because they came from abroad. However, a joyous ambiance prevailed creating an event that was manifest in the life of a Church that is capable of expressing the Words of God in a modern language.


 Sources from Vietnam said that Archbishop Nguyen Van Binh had to give the authorities words of guarantee that visit of Bishop's of Livourne would only be a peafowl reunion so that the prelate could obtain permission from the authorities to participate in the ceremony. The personalities "coming from abroad" who could not participate in the ceremony were, in fact, the two pastors of the Evangelical Christian Churches. Mgr. Ablondi himself was not able to visit the seminarians as he had projected.


  The Church in a Cage


Msgr. Claudio Celli, declared, in an interview with Radio Vatican on October 24, 1996, that he "always said- that the Catholic Church of Vietnam is in a cage. The objective of the Holy See is to make every effort to enlarge it. And, the path towards full freedom is still very  long."   The statement by the prelate from the Vatican was attested by  various instances of harassment by the State security Forces, such as the case of  H’mong Catholics (EDA 305).


      Ease of Tension


During the trip to Vietnam of the delegation of the Vatican, June 11-16, 2001, the authorities of Vietnam agreed with the Vatican about the proceedings for  Episcopal nominations, one the diocese of the North, Bui Chu, and two for two the Phan Thiet Diocese and Saigon Diocese in the South.  It was not until  more than one month later, July 14, 2001, that the Vatican could officially publish these nominations. The Reverend Joseph Hoang Van Tiem, a Saleascean priest, was chosen to be the principal bishop of the diocese Bui Chu. The Reverend Paul Nguyen Thanh Hoan, a secular priest and native of Hue, was nominated the coadjutor bishop of the diocese of Phan Thiet, and, the Reverend Vu Duy Thong became the coadjutor bishop of Saigon. The Episcopal ordinations were all officially celebrated.

      

It is noted that the new Bishop of Bui Chu, aged 63, is a native of Nam Dinh in North Vietnam. He came to reside in the South with his family at the time of the exodus to the South  in 1954. He was educated  at the Saleasean institution Granted a diploma from the Institute for Theology of Bethlem in Cisjordanie, he taught moral theology at the Grand Seminary of Da Lat. Since 1995, he had also been invited to give lecture at the grand seminary Saint Joseph of Hanoi. The ceremony during which the bishop was ordained, August 8, 2001, the Cardinal Archbishop of Hanoi Pham Dinh Tung, assisted by the bishops of Thai Binh and Phat Diem, celebrated the nomination ceremony that was described as  particularly solemn. Eighteen bishops, two of whom from Thailand and Taiwan, as well as 300 priests the majority of whom belong to the clergy of South Vietnam participated in it. More than 40,000 adepts assembled on this occasion. The bishop of Lang Son, who was in charge of Homily, offered meditation and prayer at the ceremony. At the end of the ceremony, the new bishop of Bui Chu, in his  address to his assistant celebrants, expressed joy, explicating  the meaning of  the Episcopal motto by and for himself : “All that you wail say, do them!”

    

The diocese of Bui Chu, considered as the cradle of Catholicism in North Vietnam, remained without a titular bishop after the death of the preceding bishop, Msgr. Vu Duy Nhat, on December 11, 1999. It sheltered 362,000 adepts distributed in 129 parishes. There were 51 priests, 432 nuns and 3602 Bible instructors.  The new bishop of Phan Thiet, Msgr. Nguyen Thanh Hoan is a native of Nghe An in Central Vietnam. Aged 69, he was ordained priest in 1965. His first pastoral experiences took place in the region of Dong Ha where he created and directed an orphanage, a charge he continued to assume his role when the hazards of war occurred, in 1972. He and his faithful had to move f Ham Tan where he was nominated bishop.


Ordained by Msgr. Huynh Van Nghi, the principal bishop of Phan Thiet, on August 11, 2001, in a cathedral which is too small to hold the ensemble of assistants, the new bishop Nguyen Thanh Hoan confided to the Vietnamese press that it was his directional ideas that helped animate his performance. His Episcopal motto was: “The Gospel for the Poor,”  which to him really represents the essential` goals of his program. Before his nomination, the prelate had been well known for his social activities. Since 1994, he had engaged in the social work in favor of the poor, allowing them to raise cattle or recycle paper. Attending to the youths, he helped them to elevate their education. He even helped them to pursue higher education. Msgr. Nguyen Thanh Hoan thought that one could separate propagation from the service to the poor and that the diocese of Phan Thiet is a place particularly adapted to this task. 

   

The new auxiliary bishop of Saigon, Msgr. Vu Duy Thong, aged 49, was the youngest of the three new bishops. He was born in North Vietnam, in the province of Thai Binh. After his education at the secondary seminary of Long Xuyen, he entered the grand seminary of Saigon in 1975, at the time of change of regime. Because of economic difficulties and in the absence of courses at the grand seminary during long periods, the young seminarian practiced diverse occupations to make his living. He worked as a peasant for a year at the agricultural yard of Cu Chi, as a labor at a factory of tires of bicycles, or a worker at  clothes-making shop. In 1985, he was again called to sacerdotal vocation. He was responsible for a workshop at Hoc Mon. During seven years, he devoted his sacerdotal ministry in the parish of Bach Dang and fulfilled the functions of assistant professor at Saigon Grand Seminary. From 1992 to 1998, he studied in Paris and obtained a Master’s degree in theology. Upon his return, he resumed teaching at Saigon Grand Seminary.