Saturday, January 21, 2017

The Persecution of Evangelical Christians in the Plains





     Thai Binh Province   

Security police in Thai Binh Province blocked the Christians from attending an assembly for prayers. Pastor Nguyen Van Cam related that the incident took place in front of the house of Thai, a female local resident. On the evening of August 31, 2008, the officials and security police stormed Thai’s home and interrupted the ceremony for prayers and embarrassed the Christians while they were attending a session of Bible study. Security police then blocked the entrance to the house. Meanwhile, drunken officials and security police agents cursed the Christians and showed bad manners towards female Christians. The group was disbanded without an explanation.
     
On September 9, the authorities and security police of  Thai Binh Township  dispersed a group of Christians in Tran Lam Ward while they were participating in an assembly for saying prayers. The participants were shoved into a vehicle, brought to another place, and dropped there. Acts of rudeness of the authorities, according to Pastor Nguyen Van Cam, reflected disrespect towards religion, to block with violence people like him and fellow Christians who came to serve faith. The authorities in Thai Binh, like their colleagues elsewhere in the country, voluntarily disband any assembly for prayers, regardless of rules and regulations provided by the law. The pastor stressed that the directives of the State, effective as of February 1, 2005, in particular, detailed instructions in this reogard. The People’s councils at all levels should thus conduct affairs with responsibility, protecting the believer’s rights to religious services. In practice, the authorities in Thai Binh only allowed congregations in certain localities to practice rekigious worship. The congregation at Tran Lam Ward is not one of them, although the Christians have applied for authorization.

     Hanoi

Evangelical Christianity has grown vigorously after decades of being suppressed into oblivion. The Communist authorities are seriously sensitive to this growth of the faith and keep constant watch on its activities,. particularly those by the youths of house church movement. A group of fervent Christian students at Hanoi University of Agriculture I in Gia Lam, for instance, were forbidden to participate in the Church’s religious activities. During May 20-21, 2005, two students, Hong Tran and Tran Van Phap, were convoked “to work with” the authorities at the security police headquarters on unfounded reasons. No one knew what would happen to them in the days to come.

     Haiphong

The security police of Do Son, Haiphong, during May 27-28, 2005, dismantled the assembly of 70 young Christians many of whom came from as far as Hanoi. The Christians were chased away from the place of assembly. They could not find a shelter and had to spend overnight in the open street.  Incidents of repression were btutal. On June 30, 2005, the security police of Thuy Trieu Commune, Thuy Nguyen District, Hai Phong, stormed a house church where members of a  congregation of Evangelical Christianity were attending a session of Bible study. The Christians were beaten then taken to the security police office on charge of  having operated religious activities without authorization. On May 7, The security police of Lach Tray, Haiphong City, arrested without ground about 20 city-dwellers when they gathered for saying prayers in the open sports field of Lach Tray Street. Among the arrested was Vu Minh Khanh, the wife of the well-known dissident Nguyen Van Dai, who was currently serving his prison term. They were all taken to the Lach Tray police station for interrogation and detained there overnight. Pastor Pham Huu Thinh of Do Son was also convoked for investigation for unknown reason. No one knew who the instigator was.

     Hai Duong    

Pastor Vo Si Hoa, Head  of Hai Duong Christian Congregations expressed deep concerns over the difficulties Evangelical Christianity in Kinh Mon District Hai Duong Province was facing. The authorities tightened  control against religious practices. They not only interdicted assembly for prayerst but also house performance of religious worship services. On May 14, 2005, the missionary Nguyen Van Cam and his companion Bui Van Dien were convoked “to work” with the local authorities at the police headquarters for  preaching Christianity. They were frequently harassed by the district security police due to their house visits to Dong Lam Commune, Tien Hai District, Thai Binh Province. They were targeted with threat, violence and detention thereafter.

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Doubtful Openness and Rigged Normalization






The Communist administration conferred the legal title to the Christian Evangelical Churches of Vietnam in the North  in 1958 and the Evangelical Church of Vietnam in the South in April 2001. This legal recognition is  in eyes of most Evangelicals the shackle obligation that immerses the  Churches in the State control. Growing cornern about the nature of the newly-instituted constitution was such that, on December 28, 2001, the Central Committee had to convene its members for further discussion. Disagreements surged. The committee decided to suspend its activities without explanation, To flatten out difficulty, the Bureau of Religious Affairs convened a general convention to find solution. However, the authorities appeared to be at a loss, having failed to solve this “Christian problem." It would be a shame if they could not find a solution. After Caodaism, Hoa Hao Buddhism, and the Unified Buddhist Church, the Christian Evangelical Church was the last but not least religious organization to be normalized. If they failed, State plans of pacification in the religious domain would be again put at risk. Growing demands for religious freedom had been on the rise since the early years of the 1980's when the State attempted to found a "domestic Catholic Church." 

Worse still, the authorities had not even grasped the reality. Cooperation with the authorities had come loose. They did not even figure out which and how many delegates would willingly participate in the convention. With regard to the Church, it was believed that no matter how a problem happened to occur, pastors and the Evangelical communities and local church congregations would ever cooperate with vigilance and in unity. To mete out possible opposition, the authorities projeted plans and methods of actions to prevent this from happening. Already, America Freedom House, in 2000, had published an English version of 50 pages of eight secret documents of the Vietnamese government instructing cadres and officials how to execute plans, strategies, and methods to deal with Evangelical Christianity.
    
Acting in line with legal recognition granted on it, the Church, in fact, formally requested the State authorization to facilitate such Church services as to  open seminary for the formation of pastors. On January 3, 2002, the Christian Evangelical Churches of South Vietnam received a letter of approval to open a class of seminarians. There was no surprise. Before 1975, there had been about 120,000 members and more than a hundred students receiving religious education at the seminary of Nha Trang, some dozens of students, at the School of Theology in Saigon, and hundreds of  students of the ethnic minorities, at the theological schools  in  Ban Me Thuot and Da Lat.  Even though, the number of graduates was insufficient as compared to the needs of the Church at that time. For twenty-seven years following the change of political regime, all seminaries had been closed, and the Church had not been accorded authorization to conduct programs of formation of seminarians. Many ministers of the Church ordained before 1975 had already passed away. As a result, the Church faced a severe shortage of  pastors and ministers. The administration came up with no solution but repression.

The Persecution

     The Growth of Domestic Churches

The State showed indifference. It never ceased to stop the growth of the Church. There were then 200 domestic groups of some thirty Evangelical Christian organizations. All of them were considered "illegal."  Because of this, they were targeted with violence, oppression, and repression. Their leaders and members were often accused of performing “illegal religious activities,” condemned to a fine, detained or arrested under a coup of an administrative measure. Instances of persecution happened any time. Many of these organizations of domestic Churches (Pentecost, Baptist, Mennonite, and other denominations) had functioned as religious institutions before the Communist takeover of power  in South Vietnam in April 1975.

    Anti-Christian Campaigns -- Conversion to Animism

Anti-Christian campaigns are methodical. Raids with stric measures aimed at the H'mong and Montagnards in northwestern provinces in the North specifically included obligatory seminaries to study anti-Christian propaganda and often followed by a performance of rites. The participants were subdued to obligation of drinking of a repugnant mixture of animal blood and rice wine. This attested they publicly professed their reconversion to traditional belief--animism. Similar campaigns followed, affecting a search-through operation, to inspect house after house to find bibles and other religious publications. Operations ever increased as the propagation of the faith progressed among tribal minorities in the mountainous regions. Many H'mong were initiated to the reading of Bible and other books of the Christian doctrine. The H’mong language was alphabetized, facilitating the performance of faith. The faster the congregation grew, the fiercer the repression woud become, and the more acute sufferance the congregation would  face.

In the first days under repression, the believers began to use the new scripts to write requests to the highest authorities denouncing the odious treatment that the local authorities inflicted on them. A number of complaints reached the Occident. Most of them were sent to competent authorities but came to no response. In some cases, their complaints cost the authors high price. That is the case of the family of Mua Bua Senh, cited by the Freedom House in October 2002. In May 2001 and June 2002, that family sent seven letters to the authorities to denounce the ill-treatment inflicted on a relative of the family. The victim refused to renounce his faith. As a consequence,  he died of the wounds he had suffered on August 7, 2002, having been brought from one hospital to another.
     
  Repression in the Northwestern Provinces

      Lao Kay

The unexpectedly rapid growth of Evangelical Christianity among the H'mong people in Lao Kay became a "serious problem" to the local authorities. Instructions to the officials and cadres included such recommendations as "to stop Christianity," "strong administrative measures" and "control religious leaders." Repression against H'mong Christians was such a tragedy that, beginning in 1997, it pushed these believers to evade their ancestral lands in the North. Some 15,000 H'mong left their homes in the Northwest provinces to go and seek refuge 300 km away in the Central Highlands. A large number of these H’mong abandoned their properties. Others could only sell them at lowest prices. But, anxiety never missed afterwards. During 1997-1998, Hoang Chung, an official of Muong Khuong District relentlessly sought to eradicate the faith from the district. During Christmas 1999, the Christians in the province of Lao Kay were even unaware of tragedy was to befall them, The local authorities forbade most Christian communities of H’mong to celebrate religious ceremonies. Facing threats, many adepts in the region had to go into the forest to hide; others in the more quiet provinces even had to migrate to the highlands in the South. The composition of the executive board elected by the General Assembly of the Evangelical Christian Churches had given evidences of this will of independence  from  the delegates from these H’mong communities.
     
      Viet Tri

In Viet Tri, during a peaceful assemby of worship of the domestic Church in the afternoon of Sunday, October 10, 1999, a dispute erupted when  the house-owner, Nguyen Thi Thuy, asked the police by what rule they walked her around her house. The agents of police refused to leave the house on demand but made her a fool, instead. Nguyen Thi Thuy then shut the door . The police was up, calling in  armed reinforcements.  They broke into the house Nguyen Thi Thuy was pushed onto the ground and shoved into a police vehicle. Fourteen folloers were arrested on charge of opposition against the officials of the law. They were released the same day. Nguyen Thi Thuy was detained until December 27, 1999,  the date on which she was brought to stand trial before the People’ Court. She was condemned to 12 months in prison for “having obstructed a civil servant on duty." Awhile, the police forbade family visits, specifying that the inmate was more dangerous than a murderer. Nguyen Thi Thuy was forced to avow that “she was imprisoned not because of religious worship practice but for having violated the civil law."
   
    Dien Bien

    Imprisonment 

The following is part of a list of H’mong Christians whose detention was confirmed in January 2000. They were detained  in various prisons in the northwestern provinces:

Song Phat Dia, deatained in the Dien Bien Phu prison;
Vu Giao Thao, Vang Gia Chua, Sung Vu Tung, and Sung Seo Chinh., detained at C-10 in Lao Dung Xa, Dien Phu :

Phan A Dong.In Sinh Phay Pao, Vu Sung Giay, and Vang Sua Giang, detained in the; prison of Ha Giang.

There were reportedly other prisoners detained in the various prisons in the  province of Lao Kay. Their families were informed that they would be released if they renounced their faith.

Repression against the H'mong Christians continued without respite. The "internal policy" with police raid prevailed. In mid-January 2002, reports from three independent sources saying that during December 28-29, 2002, religious services in the districts of Dien Bien Dong and Muong Lai, in the province of Lai Chau were interrupted by the police that pulverized a kind of injurious gas. The victims of the raid were quickly guarded in hostage by four security police agents who persuaded them to sign a report in which they confessed they had committed acts of aggression against the security force. Meanwhile, a woman poisoned by the gas gave birth her baby untimely. Curiously enough, this report, which was signed by the aggressors against security officials and which was delivered to the Ministry of Public Security in Hanoi not by the police but by the victims themselves.            

     The Muong Nhe Incident

On May 7, 2011  when the anniversary of Vietnam’s victory over the French Expeditionary Corps at Dien Bien Phu in 1954 was due to take place, at Muong Nhe District, Dien Bien Province, thousands of ethnic minority H’mong staged a mass protest calling for land reform and religious freedom. Military forces were sent in to crack down on the protesters. The professional security forces PA 43 were sent to the place. The authorities even deployed special military units and armed helicopters to crash the protesters. Twenty-eight protesters were killed and hundreds of them were missing. Local authorities detained several others and opened an investigation. A People’s Council official declared that the H’mong were calling for a self-administrative state and that the hostile forces living abroad were the masterminds. Le Thanh Dao, a senior province official maintained that the H’mong had done evil things since early May, gathering, and camping in unsanitary conditions to pave the way for the incident. They circulated news about a “supernatural being ” would come to  save and lead them to the “promised land.” The demonstrators were also accused of taking of the anniversary victory of Dien Bien Phu to sabotage security. Some people were arrested on charge of campaigning for the establishment of a self-administrative zone for the H'mong peope. The protest was the worst instance of unrest since the demonstrations in the Central Highlands in 2001 and 2004.  Phi Trong Lap, a local official admitted that demonstrations of this kind were not unusual. They were related to land issues. Authorities were accused of unlawfully dispossessing land from the people but were not disciplined.

Competent authorities were asked to conduct a full investigation into the unrest. Human  Rights Watch requested diplomats and international observers be given access to Muong Nhe. Foreign Ministry spoke person Nguyen Phuong Nga declared that "some extremists" had tricked from other areas to gather in Muong Nhe to cause trouble, establishing "a H'mong Kingdom" and that some overactive elements were detained for investigation, and they would be dealt with in accordance with the law.

On March 13, 2012, only one day after a U. N. agency dismissed a report by the government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam that claimied the authorities practiced no racial discrimination in the country. Contrarily, the People’s Court of Dien Bien Phu condemned eight ethnic H’mong to prison sentences of two years to 30 months followed by two years of administrative detention. The group were accused of “having partaken a separatist movement” following their involvement in a masses gathering of thousands of H’mong on May 7, 2011.

Again, on March 15, 2012, the People’s Court of Dien Bien Phu sentenced 8 H’mong  from two years to two years and a half in prison followed by two years under administrative detention on charge of causing national security disorder, in reference to Article 9 of the Criminal Code. The punishment appeared an act of admonishment on a million H’mong in the mountainous provinces in the highlands, Dien Bien, Ha Giang, Son La, Lai Chau, Yen Bay, Cao Bang, Lao Kay, Tuyen Quang, Thanh Hoa, Dak Lak, Dak Nong, and so on.         

     Bac Kan

On July 30, 2014, the Poeple's Court of Nghi Son District, Bac Kan, sentenced three H'mong, Duong Van Thanh, Hoang Van Su, and Hoang Van Sinh, to prison terms of 24 months, 18, and 15 months, respectively on charges of 'taking advantage of rights to freedom and  democracy to  break the State's law, in reference of Article 288 of the Penal Code. H'mong followers from various localities in the province were barred from coming near the Court building to claim innocence for the convicts, who were simply the follwers of a new cult and who determinedly renounced the old corrupt worship practices--the "worship of ghosts." These believers also claimed the accused had done nothing wrong, and the authorities could not even produce a proof of wrongding. As usual, they met with repression. The authorities arrested and imprisoned ardent believers and destroyed funeral homes built for sane burial services.      
`
    Quang Ninh  

Without a worship place, tChristians at Quang Ninh assembled for prayers in the private residence of Tran Van Thuong, Regular assembly took place every Saturday night. On July 3, 2006, when the assembly for prayers proceeded as usual, Tran Van Thuong was convoked to the office of the People’s Council of Cao Sinh Ward, Ha Long Township, He was informed that such an assembly was illegal and that if he continued to do so, the authorities would take measure. Tran nevertheless declared that the Christians would continue to assemble no matter what measure the civil authority would take. The General Congregation of Christians in the North to which they belong was officially recognized by the State. The application for authorization to form a congregation at Ha Long had been sent to the civil authorities. The difficulty in question had not been solved due to State administrative complications from the civil authorities, The matter came to no answer, and any assmnbly for prayers was definitely forbidden.  

    Tuyen Quang

    Harassment

Doan Van Minh, an ethic H’mong Christian leader in Tuyen Quang Province, was denied medical treatment at the hospital for his religious cause. The denial by the authorities was linked to his reformed religious practices of burial rites and rituals. Traditionally, the son of the deceased had to offer a water buffalo to ghosts and then is allowed to celebrate funeral rites and rituals, usually for three to nine days. before the burial. Many families can’t afford to do this, and follow Doan Van Minh to quit the traditional “ghost worship.” The authorities showed keen sensitivity to the new practice. In 1989, when Doan and his fellow Christians first talked about the reform, they were trailed and even arrested by the police.  

Ever since 2008, the authorities had forced H’mong Christians to go back to traditional tribal burial practices. They destroyed funeral houses in which the communers performed new funeral services. Local authorities in the Northwestern province--Cao Bang, Bac Kan, Thai Nguyen, and Tuyen Quang-- launched “campaigns of pacification to force H’mong Christians to demolish their burial homes. In 2012, eight H’mong Christians, who are Doan Van Minh’s followers, were arrested. In June 2013, the police of Tuyen Quang came to interrogate Doan Van Minh when he was in his sickbed for kidney treatment in a hospital in Hanoi. From September 2013 to January 2014, he was detained after returning from Hanoi. On February 2, he was brought to a detention camp in Hanoi. Due to poor health, he was then brought to the hospital and treated at Bach Mai Hospital Hanoi. He had to pay hospital fees although the police had told him once as he had been in a State hospital, he would not have to pay any fees.

     Arrests and Imprisonment

On March 12, 2014, the People’s Court of Tuyen Quang sentenced Hoang Van Sang, a H’mong Christian, to 18 months in prison on charge of “abusing democracy rights to infringe on the State law,” in reference to Article 258  of the Penal Code of Vietnam. The charge was linked to the defendant’s efforts to raise fund in his local community to build a “funeral home.” Hoang Van Sang was a follower of Doan Vam Minh, the precursor for reforms for burial practices in the Christian community in Tuyen Quang. Province. The accusation was also linked to the H’mong ‘s refusal to receive State subsidies, the charge H’mong community members at the trial refuted. In April 2014, the same Court sentenced two other H’mong Christians, Ly Van Dinh and Duong Van Tu to 21 months and 15 months in prison, respectively, on charges of “infringement on democracy rights” referring to Article 258 of the Penal Code of Vietnam. Security around the justice building was tight. Police checkpoints were posited along the road to the tribunal to block H’mong community members from gathering to protest agaist the verdict.