Religious Policy-The Practices
By Van Nguyen
Contrarily to the political report of the Eighth Congress which abstained from expressing on this issue, the draft of the report of the Ninth Congress of the Communist Party that appeared in January 2001 had taken on the old habit consisting in exposing the political line of the Party in the matter of religion within the framework of the chapter concerning the "union of the whole people." After the confirmation sprung from a recent evolution of religious doctrine of the Party, it is known that beliefs and religions constitute the spiritual need of the great part of the people, it is affirmed that the religious politics of the Party remained unchanged, guaranteeing equality of all citizens, the freedom to adhere or not to a religion. Them it is absolutely prohibited to utilize religious beliefs of the religion “to oppose to the law and politics of the State." That last injunction has been a little modified in the definitive version adopted at the time of the Ninth Congress (April 19-22, 2001), conditional on the troubles that happened in the Central Highlands at the beginning of February 2001. The clause became “it is absolutely forbidden to abuse the questions of ethnic minorities, beliefs, and religions to undertake activities to oppose to the law and politics of the State, cause division of the people and separation of the ethnic minorities."
By Van Nguyen
Contrarily to the political report of the Eighth Congress which abstained from expressing on this issue, the draft of the report of the Ninth Congress of the Communist Party that appeared in January 2001 had taken on the old habit consisting in exposing the political line of the Party in the matter of religion within the framework of the chapter concerning the "union of the whole people." After the confirmation sprung from a recent evolution of religious doctrine of the Party, it is known that beliefs and religions constitute the spiritual need of the great part of the people, it is affirmed that the religious politics of the Party remained unchanged, guaranteeing equality of all citizens, the freedom to adhere or not to a religion. Them it is absolutely prohibited to utilize religious beliefs of the religion “to oppose to the law and politics of the State." That last injunction has been a little modified in the definitive version adopted at the time of the Ninth Congress (April 19-22, 2001), conditional on the troubles that happened in the Central Highlands at the beginning of February 2001. The clause became “it is absolutely forbidden to abuse the questions of ethnic minorities, beliefs, and religions to undertake activities to oppose to the law and politics of the State, cause division of the people and separation of the ethnic minorities."
Remarks by
Cardinal Pham Minh Man
The text by Cardinal Pham Minh Man
explained the concept of moral person more explicit in his communiqué of
January 11, 2001, as follows:
1- The activities of the Church could not
be subject to regulations; only could religious people and organizations
conduct these activities. Therefore, the prescriptions of the law must concern,
first, religious organizations, then, religious activities only. If one wants
to issue prescriptions concerning religious activities, one must take into
account those rules that are characteristic of religious organizations. For the
religion, it is of little importance whether or not there exists the presence
of prescriptions and laws. In any manner, it continues to exist, conforming
itself to the rules proper to religion, no matter how one could issue
prescriptions to one’s own will. Otherwise, one will create conflicts
considered as persecution.
2. One could not ignore the character of moral
person that religious organizations possess in social relations. A religious
organization is a legal entity. If the law can clarify the rights and duties of
different legal entities, it is likely to avoid litigation --legal disputes--
between them when in operation.
3. It is
necessary to clarify the fundamental principles such as the following:
a. All
people whether they belong to or do not belong to a religious organization are
equal before the law.
b. The
State creates favorable conditions so that all people and all social and
religious organizations could exercise their rights to liberty.
c. The
State does not intervene in the internal affairs of religious organizations so
long as their religious activities do not cause dissent, insecurity, and
disorder in the society.
d.
Religious liberty like all other liberties of the person is a right, and this
right does not accommodate itself to a “function system” whereby applying for
authorization and granting authorization is executed.
4. For the people, in a general manner,
the two concepts of gestation and private property reveal entirely different
significations. If the law authorizes the administrator to deprive the material
or spiritual properties of the proprietors, to occupy them, or usurp them, it
then becomes an instrument of injustice. Among the material properties, there
are houses and certain diverse resources. Spiritual properties belong to the
rights of ownership of man inscribed in the constitution, written or not
written, opening way to abuse of power and accumulation of injustices by the
bureaucracy. To establish a law of this type and put it into practice would
contradict what is stipulated in the maxim: “for the people.” That
would be equally contrary to the politics that considers the service and life
and the dignity of man as the ultimate objective of the regime and the State, a
machinery system for the service of the people. The inevitable consequences of
an attitude that is contrary to these principles would be conducive to the
sabotage of social order and peace and loss of hope in the future that would
transform itself into opportunism and go astray into an impasse, the
progressive disintegration of life and augmentation of criminality Executed at
Ho Chi Minh City on January 16, 2001Mgsr. Jean-Baptiste Pham Minh Man
Archbishop of Ho Chi Minh City For the Bishops of the Archdiocese
Remarks by the
Consultative Council of Religions
The report on the debates of the
Consultative Council of Religions showed deep concerns on the religious
situation in Vietnam. Nevertheless, it diffused through electronic media
without signal. The report was the result of an assembly that took place in
Hanoi on March 9, 2002. It was the first
time that the existence of such a council was mentioned and that a consultative
report of this type was communicated to the public.
The
Socialist Republic of Vietnam
The
Central Committee of the Fatherland Front of Vietnam
The Consultative Council of Religions
Independence-Liberty- Happiness
Hanoi, March 18, 2002
To the
Members of the Consultative Council of Religions,
On March 9, 2002, the Consultative Council
assembled in a plenary session in Hanoi with the participation of the members
of the Council, several comrades of the Permanent Bureau of the President of
the Central Committee of the Fatherland Front of Vietnam, Bureau of Religious Affairs, and representatives of the
Direction of diverse services.
Comrade Pham The Duyet, Chief of the Presidium
of the Central Committee of the Fatherland Front of Vietnam and Professor Dang
Nghiem Van, President of the Consultative Council of Religions, after having
formulated a general appreciation of the works carried out in 2001 and those coordinated
in the year 2002, the members of the council, carried on their debates and
exchanges of opinions on the principal proposals presented in the circular
No.04/HDTVTG of January 25, 2002.
The presidency of the council allows itself to
regroup the opinions of the members around the following headings:
1. The problem
of land and establishments of cult of the religions
The
opinions expressed during the debate of the assembly sent to the Permanent
Bureau of the Consultative Council are established in conformity with the
principles of orientation suggested by the presidency of the council, namely:
- The settlement of the questions concerning land
and establishments of cult, in the first place, must aim to perform the
services to the interests of the people. It must be conformed to the concrete
conditions and situation of the country as well as characteristics of the
religion.
- It is not the question of requiring that
the land and establishments of cult that have been offered to the State or a
collective group be rendered to the original owner under one or any other
forms. However, a problem still remains: the State or collective group must
utilize them in conformity with the primary objective for the activities of
social service such as opening schools and building medical or cultural
establishments. They must not let the opportunists occupy, share, and sell
them.
- As far as land is concerned, the establishment of
cult that the organs of the State or a collective group has borrowed (for a
short or long term) of which the population took possession, the question of
restoration of these establishments must be raised if the religions need to
utilize them.
- The
restitution will take a form appropriate to the concrete situation of each
case. But, each time, there will be a unique rule: the property will be
restored in its original state if it has been exchanged, or bought.
The representatives present at the assembly
their thought according to which it is necessary to create a council composed
of the elements of competent organs of the government, the Fatherland Front,
the collectivity, and the local religious organizations. These components will discuss and, in the
spirit of concord, will agree on the forms or rules conditional on concrete
cases.
Besides, they recommended:
- When it is a matter of settlement
concerning the questions of land or establishments of cult that have been
offered, the State must take into account the concrete circumstances. It is
necessary to determine who made the offertory and made it legally, if he
possessed the legal statute of representative as determined by the religious
organization. Thus, a priest of a parish is only a manager of the religious establishment;
he is not in no capacity to offer the establishment. Only the bishops have this
competence.
- It
should be a question if the offer by an individual or an organism has been
freely carried out or not? Has there been pressure or constraint?
2. Education and Humanitarian Work
. Assumed role of religions in the domains of
education, health, and social works The opinions of the scientists and
religious dignitaries of the Consultative Council were accorded: the State and
the Party advocate socialization encourage organisms and individuals to offer
the State their cooperation in the domains of education, health, culture,
social works. The Party and State also consider the religions as members of the
society, equal with the others. There is no reason, then, to limit
the participation of religions in the socialization in these domains. The
State, thus, has to promulgate concrete political lines and laws susceptible to
favor the internal forces, create favorable conditions so that religious
organizations and religious personalities could contribute to the opening of
schools not only at the "maternal"
and "kindergarten" levels as is the case today but also at
elementary, secondary, professional, and university levels. In a parallel way, the religions will be
treated on an equal footing with other members of the society in other domains
such as sports, entertainment, medicine, public health care. ..
The members of the Consultative Council (including
seven religious dignitaries) agree by common consent on a principle: in their
participation in the activities concerning these diverse domains, religious
organizations and religious personalities must engage themselves in respecting
the regulations fixed by the competent organs of the State such as the Ministry
of Education and Information, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Labor, Invalids
and Social Works, Ministry of
Construction concerning internal activities, programs, local schools and
teachers, type of construction, and so on. Besides, religious organizations and
religious personalities, in any form, must not propagate the religion or the
policy in contravention of the Constitution and the law at educational, health,
cultural, events. The ministries and services concerned will have to orient
their activities with regulations and sanctions. The right to mastership of our
religious fellow countrymen will thus be stimulated in their participation in
the defense and building of the fatherland, and harmonization of the sacred and
the secular. It should be guaranteed that the necessary management and orientation of religious activities will be
accomplished in conformity with the political directives and the law.
3. Formation of Ecclesiastics and the Religious
The members of the Consultative Council think that
the work of formation is very important. It aims at forming members of the
clergy and religious of diverse religions endowed with sufficient qualities and
knowledge, enlivened with national spirit to serve religion and the fatherland
and devoted themselves to the religious activities of our religious fellow
countrymen.
Many representatives proposed that the organs of the
State, the Fatherland Front orient and control permanently the organization of
educational establishments, their interior life, their programs of studies, the
teaching staff attached to the houses of formation. It is necessary to pay more
heed to the content of teaching in matters of culture, national history,
political lines of the Party and State, and thus the national spirit and the
civic conscience of future ecclesiastics could be elevated. In addition, the
State should have a more open-minded attitude when it is a question of
authorizing the religious to open schools of houses of formation of the clergy,
to avoid the phenomenon of "clandestine" religious formation and
ordination motivated by extremely urgent needs. Besides, it is stressed that
the clergy endowed with good quality be cultivated, the religion will then be
purer, and the believers will not fall into superstition.
4. The Subject of Religious Associations
The point, the members of
the Consultative Council have issued diverging ideas. Three categories of
opinions are classified into categories as follows:
- According to the first category, the State must
not maintain doubts or pose problems concerning the nature of religious
associations that they are actually suffering. It has to consider their
activities as ordinary activities taking place in a habitual setting and accept
them with a spirit of respect for freedom of religious belief. The religions
only need to have their activities registered with the local authorities, to
submit to their own directional principles and orientations with the
responsibility of their chief. They don't have then need to solicit the
authorization of the power.
- For the second category of opinions, the
nature of each association should be distinguished. For the purely religious
associations, such activities as funeral rites, music bands, and festival processions
will have no need to be registered. The associations of social character, those
that reassemble a congregation (Eucharist Crusade, Third Order, etc.,) have no
need to be registered. It is necessary to have the interior regulations
registered, such as the appellation of the association, the directional
principles and orientation of the association with the direction and general
orientation of the Fatherland Front and social agencies.
- A
third category of opinions support the argument that it is not necessary to
determine the nature of a religious association. The association needs the
approval of the government to conduct activities. The government examines the
interior regulations, directional principles, objectives, and the appellation
of the organization if all that appears are clear to it, it accords
authorization. The activities of the organization could be placed under the
orientation of the Fatherland Front and social instances.
- From the attitude to adopt strict measures against
the "new religious phenomenon" also called “foreign religions,"
"paste religions," or still “new sects"
To this
proposal, there exist two types of opinions:
- The great
majority of ecclesiastics of diverse religions have issued this opinion: The State must control and absolutely
counteract the activities of new religious phenomena, that they have their
origin in the interior or exterior of the country in such a way that
traditional religions as well as public order be protected. The traditional
religions will mobilize their faithful in order that they would not be
attracted by these new religious phenomena.
- For
others, the new religious phenomena could be classified into two categories,
positive and negative. Most of them belong to the second category. The State
must, then, weigh the pros and cons give concrete judgment for each case and
avoid errors.
5. How to guarantee a purely religious life
All members of the council were unanimous in their
consideration that it is necessary for religious activities be characterized
with honesty. As they declared themselves to resolutely eliminate such negative
phenomena as superstition, backward customs, utilization of religion for
economic and political ends. If not realized, will these phenomena have, in
effect, a decreasing influence on the credibility of religion, society, and country?
The attitude
to be adopted with regard to these phenomena has been described. The
authorities, the Fatherland Front in association with the Churches will
sanction in opportune time and according to the seriousness of violation of the
religious or civil laws. Besides, it is necessary to exhibit and diffuse
extensively and intensively on the national media the examples of good harmony
between the secular and the sacred by the clergy or by the faithful of diverse
religions.
One ecclesiastic present at the assembly proposed
that the television channel V introduces in one of its emissions "The Contemporaries" or "Reserved to the Admirers”
the examples of patriotism of authentic religions. Thus, the masses will be
mobilized and members of all religions will be encouraged to follow them.
Other ecclesiastics suggested that the State should,
by its orientations, encourage the religions to limit the exaggerated expenses
led by the triumphant spirit of rivalry, such as the construction of churches,
pagodas, or temples, organizations of excessively solemn festivals, exhausting
seriously the physical forces and financial resources of the faithful. Still,
others some even opposed to measures to reexamine the modalities of the quest
or collections to assure that the contributions of the masses faithful be
voluntary and in conformity with good manners and civilization.
6. Diverse opinions
In addition to the ten subjects that are the
object of debate of the members of the Consultative Council, concrete problems
were raised: proposals concerning the changes of the internal structures,
methods, budget, and credits were discussed so that the Council could function
more efficaciously.
A
Special Case: Caodaism
The superior dignitary Tran Duc Tang of Caodaism,
after having summarily presented the actual situation of the nine branches of Caodaism,
each having a statute of moral person, proposed that the Fatherland Front at
the provincial as well as national levels attend to organizing sessions of
studies. Political lines of the Party, legislation of State as well as the
maneuvers of the enemies from abroad consisting in utilizing religion for their
profit should be taught to the dignitaries of diverse branches of Caodaism. He
also proposed that the Fatherland Front intervenes besides the People's
Councils of certain provinces and cities of the South that Caodaists be
authorized to build and restore the establishments of cult destroyed or
engulfed in the war.
The Buddhist
Church: The Venerable Thich Thong Buu (of the circle of Thich Quang Duc, Ho
Chi Minh City) and many others of his fellow monks asked the Fatherland Front to send a directive signaling the
presence of the members of the Consultative Council of religious to the
Peoples' councils of the provinces and cities where they live so that the
Fatherland Front could establish relations and create necessary conditions so
that they could operate activities without misunderstanding. This opinion was
approved and a directive will soon be sent to the provincial and urban
councils.
Hoa
Hao: Thai Van Nam, the Vice-president of the
Representative Committee of Hoa Hao Buddhism proposed to the State to accord Hoa Hao Buddhism a
create a religious flag and a statute of religious organization for Church like
other religions in order to avoid ill-intentioned people to deform the
religious policy of the Party. The representative of Hoa Hao also proposed to
the Front to intervene besides the State so that the conditions for the opening
of classes of formation of dignitaries in charge of religious matter are
created.
Catholicism: Fr. Thien Cam, a member of
the Committee of Union of Catholicism at Ho Chi Minh City believes that the
State should put into practice a concrete policy to help religious
organizations to refit themselves the material damages at the time of restitution
of religious establishments occupied by the organisms or individuals, the
damages not caused by them. When the State undertakes the works of
infrastructure for which the establishment of cult (churches or pagodas) in
residential quarters, it also has to create necessary conditions in the matter
of land and credits so that the religions could rebuild new establishments of cult
in the same commune or residential quarters. In effect, the actual cultural
establishments are linked to the commune communities and quarters and could not
be separated from one another. The priest also asks the popular Front to
intervene besides the government in order that it will authorize the Catholic
congregations the inter-congregation houses of studies to form the religious
because the congregations have a mode of religious life different from that of
the grand seminaries. Nowadays, the majority of religious are still not able to
operate on a regular basis. Their religious, political and civic standards
remain limited. The Director of
Religious Affairs of the government has promised for many years to settle this
problem but has never made it.
The
concrete opinions by the participants will be transmitted by the Council to competent
organs. This is the synthesis of the content of the debate of the Consultative
Council of Religions in its plenary session at the beginning of 2002. The
diverse opinions were presented to the Permanent Bureau of the Presidium of
Central Committee of the Fatherland Front. The presidency of the Council
informs this to the participants, hoping that they will bring in it the
complements with which it will inform the Permanent Bureau.
We would
like to ask you to send your complementary contributions to the following
address: Mr. Dinh Van Lanh, Permanent Member of the Consultative Council of
Religions, 46 Trang Thi, Hanoi; Tel: 048 246 252
For the
Consultative Council of Religions
Signature:
Prof. Dang Nghiem Van
No comments:
Post a Comment