The same problem posed for the the authorities in
the South where the actual leader, aged 98, had serious health problems. The
authorities insisted that the prospective successor should meet preconditions to
work with the authorities to regularize the Church's activities and restructure the Church's organization. This subjugation
of the Evangelical
Christian Churches
to State control was nevertheless a complex process and was thus proceeded through complicated series of negotiations between
the administration and leaders of
various denomination of Evangelical Christian Churches. The authorities applied the same method of assimilation they had
in 1985 when the Buddhist Church of Vietnam was placed under the patronage of
the Fatherland Front. By this method, they had given Islam, various denominations
of Caodaism and independent sects of Hoa Hao Buddhism official recognition. As
a result, the religions faced internal division. Many among these denominations
or sects were then controlled by the
State and functioned in its terms; others were outlawed and survived under repression
or persecution. Only can the Roman Catholic Church be spared from undergoing this
process of normalization.
In the beginning, the normalization of Evangelical
Christian Churches proceeded without friction. The State Bureau of Religious
Affairs predisposed stages to activate processes of assimilation, first, by
convincing leaders of various Evangelical Christian Churches in South Vietnam to
integrate their congregations into a single organization. The stage after next,
it officially granted them legal status and began to “normalize” the relations
between it and the various denominations, intergrating them into the "United
Church," and gradually placed them under its control, to operate within
the orbit of the Fatherland Front, like any other satellite Communist-oriented
organizations. This process of the normalization started on January 28, 2000. .
The
Obstacles
For a long time, certain leaders of the Evangelical Christian
Churches in the South, in reality, had initiated negotiation with the Bureau of
Religious Affairs. The World Commission of Evangelical Union
on Religious Freedom. in Singapore, on February 16, 2000, announced that the
authotities would approved of a constitution draft following a proposal for the normalization of three phases of the Evangelical
Christian Churches in the South. Still, there was doubt among the Evangelicals over
a propitious time for the start of the negotiation. The difficulty, in the
first place, was the fact that the Evangelical Christian Churches of the South
were then in disaray. Some 300 communities had practically had no universality
so far as the direction the Church should take. The Bureau of Religious
Affairs, by arbitrary decision, came to terms with certain leaders who willingly
took side with the authorities, This conduct of affairs of the Bureau of
Religious Affairs became the object of doubts to other leaders that had for a
long time had little confidence in the regime. According to the agency UCANEWS,
a pastor in Ho Chi Minh City
who asked anonimity might have declared out of
fear that the new Bureau of Mobilization, directed by a pastor of the
Center-Vietnam, the Reverend Duong Thanh, would hardly find a common ground with
which he was capaable of unifying the Evangelical Christian Churches of South Vietnam
(UCANEWS, October 25, 2000).
The
Negotiations
In January 2000, the Vice-director of the Bureau of
Religious Affairs, Nguyen Van Chinh led the delegation of the administration to
negotiate with several leaders of the Evangelical Christian
Churches of South Vietnam. Previously, negotiations between the two
parties always prolonged and came to a standstill. However, the authorities
thought that they would gain better results this time as the Church leaders
agreeably came to the negotiation table. On January 28, 2000, a three-phase negotiation agenda
was agreed on by the two parties. A general congress of Church leaders would be
held, and twenty-five pastors would be delegated to the convention to discuss the
processes of unification of the Church in the presence of the officials of the
Bureau of Religious Affairs. The second phase would see the enlargement of the second convention with 25 pastors. There should necessarily be the
participation in a convention of 65 members to prepare work for a constitution
that could be acceptable to the government. If no inconvenience to the
authorities occurred, authorization to convene a congress at the national level
would be granted. The Bureau of Religious Affairs would engage in this affair.
It would have a final say on the approval of the candidacy to the would-be
Committee of Direction of the Church. The third phase would complete the task
with the nomination of certain pastors to the new leadership of the Church.
The authorities were optimistic about the results.
They declared that this was a great achievement in the year 2000. Le Quang Vinh, the director of the Bureau of
Religious Affairs, during a ceremony, declared before the representatives of
the government and leaders of Evangelical Christian Churches of the province of Quang Tri that “ the Prime Minister granted admission
to the Committee of Religious Affairs the nomination of 25 pastors.” The official daily Saigon Giai Phong,
on October 23, 2000,
praised the creation of the Committee of Mobilization, considering this the
first step towards achieving great reunion of various denominations of Evangelical
Christianity, and a significant move towards the creation of an Association of
Protestants of Vietnam. The Vietnamese Information Agency (VNI) also spoke
highly of the task
For its part, the new Committee called on Evangelical
Christians to contribute to work on the Church’s primary task, to institute a
constitution for the new Church. In its communique to members of the Church, it
stressed that the stipulations in constitution must comply with the principles of
the faith and be in agreement with the traditions of the Church, namely, the respect
for national traditions and the values social life. These tenets must be
performed in conformity with the political lines of the government as indicated
in the motto of the Church: “For God, for the country, and for the nation and
the Fatherland.” In reality, the Committee failed to dissimulate iembarrassment.
Evangelical Christian communities in South Vietnam were largely indifferent to
all works of "normalization" of the State. That is a process of
assimilation through which the State tied the Church to the Syate-affiliated Fatherland
Front, circulating under its control and within its orbit.
A New Charter
Long before, the official journal Nhan Dan had
affirmed that a charter for Evangelical Christianity “should respect the
national tradition and social life and be in conformity with the Constitution
and the laws of the country.” On December 28, 2000, by the time
disagreement between members in the committee for elaboration of the project of
the charter occured, there had already existed two versions. One was the
primeval version of the project that had been adopted by the majority of leaders
of the Church, and that the other one that had been amended, first, by the
presidium of the committee then by the Bureau of Religious Affairs. The members
of the committee, in a motion affirmed that the two versions were attached to
the first draft for preference. Texts of orientations were circulated within
the Evangelical Christian circles for suggestions.
Speculations circulated in some congregations. Some
members of the Church expcted that the creation of a charter would generate a
positive effort that would facilitate more religious services and activities.
Others nevertheless saw in the official
recognition of the Church a strategy by the authorities destined to control the
Christians more restrictively. Evangelicals were primarily considered by the State the most
antagonistic elements to the regime. They boggled at the intervention of the
State not only because of its strict
control but largely because of repression befalling them. Local Evangeal Christians
in the Central Highlands mostly suffered severe persecutions, and unrest was
likely to happen at any time. A charter for the Church was a only move towards
"normalization," placing recalcitrant Evangelicals under strict
totalitarian control.
No comments:
Post a Comment