The number of candidates to priesthood was
conditional on rules and regulations by the State authorities. Only ten
students in each diocese were admitted to a seminary every two years. These
conditions and others eventually hindered religious services and the
performance of religious duties by lack of priests. Impediments to formation of priests,
therefore, created serious problems to the Church. In the North, religious education was banned
before the Vietnam War (1955-1975). The penury of priests in the North after
decades of persistent repression during the Vietnam War was critical. Beginning
in 1988, seven dioceses in the North could send prospective seminarians to
Hanoi for religious education. For 5 years (1988-1992), the number of
candidates still remained very low. Only a hundred students were admitted to
the grand seminary. When the grand seminary of Hanoi reopened, it could only
operate one class every two years. Worse still, it could only receive from each
of seven dioceses 10 students every academic term. Of 100 candidates that were
officially recommended by the local authorities, a diocese could only receive
about ten due to such factors considered as "unfavorable" social and
political backgrounds. by the authorities.
In the South, after the fall of the Republic of
Vietnam on April 30, 1975, the Communist regime closed down the inter-diocesan
seminaries in Saigon and Vinh Long. Seminarians were to return to their local
dioceses. In the 1980’s, only six seminaries were permitted to reopen but were
subject to strict State rules and regulations. For example, a new education
term could only begin every six years, and only fifty seminarians could be
admitted each new term. The rules and regulations
vacillated between permission and withdrawal of permission from the
authorities. No sooner had a measure been put into effect than another one
nullified it.
The seminaries in Da Lat, Phan Thiet, Xuan Loc, Saigon, My Tho, and Can
Tho were authorized to reopen, but operated
conditionally on restrictions. The requirements to be met were: 1) A new
scholastic term will only begin every
other three years; 2) The appointment of
a member of the Church to the teaching staff must be approved by the State.
Each teaching staff comprises six professors with one of whom must be
state-designated; 3) Applicants to the seminary are required to have good
social and political records and are to be recommended by the local
authorities; and 4) Programs of education must be submitted to and approved by
the State.
Under these conditions, the Church unavoidably faces
a severe shortage of priests. Given that 50 applicants admitted every other
three years for a six-year scholastic term, only 10 out of the 50 seminarians
are expected to become priests each term. Reality shows that the majority of
young seminarians generally wilt not be
able to overcome trials of an ascetic life of priesthood and abandon vocation
to the priesthood halfway. Besides, the number of old and retired priests
increases every year. Worse still, those priests who returned from the
reeducation camps are forbidden to resume to perform priestly duties and forced
to return to their families. This situation poses a serious problem to the
Church. The shortage of priests will
lead to an erosion of the clerical body of the Church, adding weight on its ministry throughout the
country.
From 1986 to 1988, six seminaries in Da Lat, Phan
Thiet, Xuan Loc, Saigon, My Tho, and Can Tho were authorized to reopen, but the
conditions were still rigorous. They were to meet such requirements as: 1) A
new scholastic term will begin every other three years. 2) The requirements for
seminary professors must be approved by the State. There will be six professors
at most, and one of them must be State-assigned. 3) Applicants for these
institutions are required to have good social and political background and
their nomination must be approved by the local authorities, and 4) The programs
of education must be submitted to and approved by the State.
Candidates to the priesthood are subject to
verification of identity. The center of sacerdotal training has to clarify the
social and political background of the student. The State-affiliated National
Assembly deputy Phan Khac Tu complained at the eleventh assembly (1997) that
young men and women in the country who want to become priests or nuns actually
face strict restrictions simply because they are not accorded permits of
permanent residents in the city. Numerous requirements affect the recruit of
the candidates. The restriction on the number of candidates to seminaries or
nunneries create difficulties to the formation of priests.
Given that 50 applicants were admitted to a grand
seminary every other three years for a six-year scholastic term, only 10 out of
50 seminarians are expected to become priests each term. This remark, which is
based on fact and realty, shows that the majority of young seminarians
generally will not ably overcome the trials of the ascetic life of priesthood.
In addition, old and ailing priests are due for retirement, and priests who
returned from the reeducation camps are forced to return home, thus reducing
the number of priests on duty and adding weight on the extreme shortage of
priests throughout the country.
In late March 1993, the chairman of the State
Committee for Religions Affairs Vu Quang in a circular informed the
Church of the government’s new religious policy. The law-order specifically stated that “ There will be solutions to the current
issue of religion. The government will be ready to allow a number of Catholic
priests to go and study religious subjects overseas. Those priests who return
from reeducation will be allowed to resume their priesthood if their conduct
proves to be appropriate. Seminaries who are legally accredited by the
government will be allowed to function whether they are in the South or the
North.” Nevertheless, these problems remained unsolved, unavoidably
discrediting the government new policy.
Only a small number of priests were allowed to go and study in Paris,
France. Quite a few priests who returned
from “reeducation” were not permitted to perform pastoral services. In Dong Soai Parish,
Saigon, where the State priest Phan Phac Tu was the pastor, as a case in
evidence, several priests of this category could only do their duty “in hiding”
under the pastor’s “umbrella.”
Under the new rules and regulations, the candidates
to the priesthood were subject to rigorous requirements. Over the years, only
10 candidates of each diocese were admitted to a seminary every two years.
These conditions and other difficulties eventually hindered the Church religious
education and ministry. Msgr. Nguyen Son Lam, Secretary of the Episcopal
Conference, brought up the question of religious formation before the general
assembly of bishops. At the Episcopal Conference of Vietnam (2001, the
dignitary hoped that the term fixed for the recruit of the seminarians should
renew every two years, and the limited number of candidates imposed by the
State should be abolished.
A diocese
like Thanh Hoa of which Msgr. Nguyen Son Lam was in charge, only had the right
to receive 12 candidates every two years. Nonetheless, the local authorities unilaterally interfered
in the Church's internal affairs, exercising
control on it, fixing the number the number of the candidates. Only 8 of them were authorized to accede to
the candidacy. The Episcopal Conference also wished to see more seminaries to be instituted
o the candidacy. Two new institutions should be instituted as annexed
seminaries functioning within the grand seminaries of Saigon and Hanoi. One
annexed seminary should be established at Xuan Loc, in the South, and another
one, in the diocese of Thai Binh, in the North. However, difficulties arising
from overt disagreement between the central and regional authorities, negating
the bishops’ wishes. Until 2001, there was no response from the
authorities. (EDA 323. Visit of the
Vatican to Vietnam (June 11, 2001).
The Ordination
The Decree 69/HDBT of March 21, 1991 stipulates that
the ordination of priests of diverse religions has to be approved by the
authorities concerned of the provincial people’s council. For two decades,
the Church's obsolete clergy diminished
incontestably. In spate instances, priests had to be ordained "in
hiding," as was the case of Fr. Pham Van Lois of Hue Diocese.
Worse still, old seminarians had to wait for years
to be ordained. The case of the diocese of Kontum in the Central Highlands is
an example. On August 25, 1998, Bishop Pierre Tran Thanh Chung was allowed to
confer ordination on the prospective priest Joseph Tran Ngoc Tan, who had been
waiting for 23 years to receive ordination due to delay of authorization from the civil administration. The preceding
ordination in this diocese took place in 1992.
It was also the case of Fr. Nguyen Quang Vinh, who was the first priest
in the diocese to be ordained with State authorization. He was then 45 years
old. He had begun his theological studies at the pontifical seminary of Da Lat
before the Communist takeover of South Vietnam in April 1975.
In the North, after more than forty years of
interruption, a cleric was ordained priest in the monastery Chau Son of the
diocese Phat Diem. Everyone agrees to qualify the recent ordination of Father
Bui Van Hung, a cleric, as an historic event. A celebration presided over by
the Cardinal Joseph Pham Dinh Tung took place on July 2, 2001. at the abbey of
Chau Son in the diocese of Phat Diem, Ninh Binh, North Vietnam. In effect, not
only did this celebration, which was a discreet-mark of the beginning of
revival of a monastery whose life had been
perturbed since 1954, but also and above all, the rebirth of the religious life in North
Vietnam. Fr. Bui Van Hung was the first cleric ordained priest in North Vietnam
since the political partition of Vietnam in 1954. Fr. P. Antoine Doan Minh Hai
who served the parish nearest to the monastery confided that this ordination
was, for him, the sign of gleam of hope that shined again on the religious
community after so many years of adversity.
No comments:
Post a Comment