The conflict between the
State and the Unified Buddhist Church grew increasingly tense. The
State-affiliated Buddhist Church entered the fight. The State-instituted
Executive Council of Buddhism in a session of work attributed to the activities
of the dissident Church as dangerous.
Many monks of the outlawed Church were accused of “having sabotaged the
solidarity among the Buddhists as well as national union.” (AFP, Feb. 8, 1995).
The remark was reportedly pronounced by the Venerable Kim Cuong Tu,
Vice-president of the Council and aimed at the leaders of the Vietnam Unified
Buddhist Church as well as the members of the State-created Church who
supported the demands for independence from the State. The State, on its part,
showed vigilance and determination.
The persecution of the
Unified Buddhist Church was in full swing. On November 22, 1996, approximately
200 security police raided the 500-year-old Linh Mu Pagoda and arrested several
prominent Buddhist monks, among whom were the Venerable Thich Hai Thinh and the
Venerable Thich Hai Chanh who had served terms in jail for taking part in the
1993 event, protesting against the Communist rule's religious repression. The
local Communist rule took control of the pagoda under the pretext that it was a
center for anti-Communist activities. The police also razed to the ground the
Long Tho Pagoda near the resort township of Da Lat, 110 miles north of
Saigon. On October 30, 1996, the
Venerable Thich Minh Dao, the senior monk at Long Tho Pagoda, Da Lat Township,
was arrested, and 34 other Buddhist monks and nuns were chased out of the
pagoda before it was destroyed.
Repression
The Puebla Institute, a
human right organization that defends religion worldwide reported that
repression against all Vietnam’s religions continued. Vietnam, it noted,
demonstrates that the repressive apparatus against all religions remains
widespread and resilient despite the market reforms. A number of religious
prisoners were among five thousand and two hundred (5,200) prisoners released
from prison by the chief of the State on the National Day, September 2, 1998.
Until then, 75 Buddhist monks and followers were still detained or placed under
house arrest. Three Buddhist monks benefited from this annual amnesty. They
were the Venerable Thich Tri Sieu, who
was freed from prison on August 31, 1998 and the Venerable Thich Tue Sy and the
Most Venerable Thich Quang Do. who were liberated the next day, September 1,
1998. The Most Venerable Thich Quang Do,
the Secretary-general of the Vietnam Unified Buddhist Church, was freed from
the Ba Sao camp, Nam Ha Province, North Vietnam, September 2, 1998. Arrested in
1977 and detained for 20 months, he was apprehended again in 1982 and exiled to
the province of Thai Binh, North Vietnam. In 1992, the monk, on his own
initiatives, left the place of exile. He came back and lived in Saigon.
He was restricted on January
4, 1995 after having written to the Communist authorities an open letter of
three pages entitled “Remarks on the Ill-conceived Errors Committed by Communism
against Buddhism.” On August 15, 1995, the People’s Court imposed on him five
years in prison for “having committed acts of sabotage against the politics of
union of religions and utilized liberty and democracy to make an attempt of
sabotage against the interests of the State.” He refused to make an appeal. He
was then transferred from Saigon to North Vietnam and detained in the Ba
Sao camp. Released from prison, he was
welcomed at the Tan Son Nhat Airport by five hundred Buddhist followers. The
Most Venerable Thich Quang Do has been closely watched over by the State
authorities.
The Measures
The common repressive
measure applied to returnees from prisons and camps are administrative
surveillance and harassment. The decree on administrative detention (1977), on
the other hand, allows the Communist administration to lengthen the term of
detention to two years without trial. It aims to prevent, threaten, compel, and
repress dissidents from advocating democracy and human rights. This form of
arrest was executed against the Most Venerable Thich Huyen Quang.
Requests and demands from
the Church nevertheless fell to deaf ears. The authorities mounted repression
on it, instead. A string of
instances of repression came in succession, aggravating the situation. In
addition, the State failed to integrate the Vietnam Unified Church into the
State-sponsored Vietnam Buddhist Church. Like a thorn in its side, the Unified
Buddhist Church always proved to be a legal and independent Church and not an
association. In this regard, it
resolutely refuted the legitimacy of the Buddhist Church of Vietnam as a
rightful entity as it is only an instrument of the Vietnamese Communist Party--
a member of the Fatherland Front- a
creation of the Vietnamese Communist Party itself.
Due to the failure to
subordinate the Vietnam Unified Buddhist Church under State control, the
Vietnamese Communist Party and State isolate it from the people’s life.
Cornered to dead end, the Church survives in extreme conditions, although it
continuously receives strong support from international public opinion, human
rights organizations, world prestigious personalities and politicians, and
Vietnamese religious organizations and communities overseas
The Eighth congress of the
Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam Overseas, Office II, in California in May
1999 proceeded with determination to consolidate its body of leadership
overseas, to and foster its activities in support for the struggle for
religious freedom and Buddhist Faith in the country. Nominations to highest
positions in the hierarchy and adjustments in the administration of the Church
in the country were then revived (EDA 288). Humanitarian services and
activities were organized and performed, although in harsh conditions of severe
weather and impediment from the government. The delegations of aids to the
regions devastated by flood of the Unified Church nevertheless gathered
remarkable success.
The Vietnam Unified Buddhist
Church has still proven to be worthy of a religious institution that not only
dedicates itself to the noble ideals of clemency of the Buddhist Faith but also
commits acts of tangible fearlessness when it comes to salvage human beings. In
his letter sent to the government, the Patriarch Huyen Quang on the occasion of
the commemoration of April 30 --the day when the Communists took over Saigon--
proposed, among other things, to the government
to clarify that the anniversary
of the liberation of Saigon is a day for penitence and mourning (EDA 308).
The State Bureau of Religious Affairs nonetheless
mounted pressure on the Church, suggesting to the Church to encourage its monks and adepts to rejoin
the ranks of the “official” Church.
However, many religious personalities of Buddhism felt reluctant to the
State hypocritical mannerism; others showed indignation over the State
persecution of the Church. Frequent
visits of the police who came to interrogate them on diverse hot subjects
remained a nightmare. Reports and interviews on these incidents were
transmitted to humanitarian agencies in the Occident (communiques of the Bureau
of Buddhist International Information from July 18, 2000 and August 10, 2000).
No comments:
Post a Comment